[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <a7d85678-c242-6a92-55d3-bb593e508f28@igalia.com>
Date: Fri, 1 Nov 2024 16:38:32 -0300
From: "Guilherme G. Piccoli" <gpiccoli@...lia.com>
To: Ping-Ke Shih <pkshih@...ltek.com>
Cc: "kvalo@...nel.org" <kvalo@...nel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"kernel@...ccoli.net" <kernel@...ccoli.net>,
"kernel-dev@...lia.com" <kernel-dev@...lia.com>,
"rtl8821cerfe2@...il.com" <rtl8821cerfe2@...il.com>,
"stable@...r.kernel.org" <stable@...r.kernel.org>,
"syzbot+edd9fe0d3a65b14588d5@...kaller.appspotmail.com"
<syzbot+edd9fe0d3a65b14588d5@...kaller.appspotmail.com>,
"linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org" <linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V3] wifi: rtlwifi: Drastically reduce the attempts to read
efuse in case of failures
>> [...]
>> struct rtl_priv *rtlpriv = rtl_priv(hw);
>> + u16 retry, max_attempts;
>> u32 value32;
>> u8 readbyte;
>> - u16 retry;
>> +
>> + /*
>> + * In case of USB devices, transfer speeds are limited, hence
>> + * efuse I/O reads could be (way) slower. So, decrease (a lot)
>> + * the read attempts in case of failures.
>> + */
>> + if (rtlpriv->rtlhal.interface == INTF_PCI)
>> + max_attempts = 10000;
>> + else
>> + max_attempts = 10;
>
> As your comment, setting max_atttempts to 10 under condition of INTF_USB would
> be more reasonable, like
>
> u16 max_attempts = 10000;
>
> if (rtlpriv->rtlhal.interface == INTF_USB)
> max_attempts = 10;
>
OK, thanks.
V4 just sent:
https://lore.kernel.org/r/20241101193412.1390391-1-gpiccoli@igalia.com
Powered by blists - more mailing lists