[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <d2997f40-a328-4c86-be2f-982e72b06401@huawei.com>
Date: Fri, 1 Nov 2024 11:49:09 +0800
From: Zicheng Qu <quzicheng@...wei.com>
To: Matti Vaittinen <mazziesaccount@...il.com>, <linux-iio@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
CC: <tanghui20@...wei.com>, <zhangqiao22@...wei.com>,
<judy.chenhui@...wei.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] iio: fix memory leak for
iio_gts_build_avail_scale_table()
Hi Matti,
Thank you for your concern! I haven't used it in my projects yet. I came
across this issue while using smatch for code analysis. After reviewing
the code, I noticed a few minor issues. However, I did not realize that
the patch for the memory leak has already been submitted couple of days
ago. Apologies for not checking the patches thoroughly and submitting a
duplicate.
Yours,
-- Zicheng
On 2024/10/31 15:32, Matti Vaittinen wrote:
> Hi Zicheng
>
> On 31/10/2024 03:47, Zicheng Qu wrote:
>> In iio_gts_build_avail_scale_table(), the memory allocated for
>> per_time_gains is freed using kfree(per_time_gains) before return 0.
>> However, the type per_time_gains is 'int **', and the memory allocated
>> for its inner elements is not being freed, leading to a memory leak.
>>
>> Cc: stable@...r.kernel.org # v6.6+
>> Fixes: 38416c28e168 ("iio: light: Add gain-time-scale helpers")
>> Signed-off-by: Zicheng Qu <quzicheng@...wei.com>
>> ---
>> drivers/iio/industrialio-gts-helper.c | 2 ++
>> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/iio/industrialio-gts-helper.c
>> b/drivers/iio/industrialio-gts-helper.c
>> index 59d7615c0f56..f2450b2e740d 100644
>> --- a/drivers/iio/industrialio-gts-helper.c
>> +++ b/drivers/iio/industrialio-gts-helper.c
>> @@ -307,6 +307,8 @@ static int iio_gts_build_avail_scale_table(struct
>> iio_gts *gts)
>> if (ret)
>> goto err_free_out;
>> + for (j = 0; j < gts->num_itime; j++)
>> + kfree(per_time_gains[i]);
>> kfree(per_time_gains);
>> gts->per_time_avail_scale_tables = per_time_scales;
>
> You're right, thanks!
> This, however, was already fixed by:
> https://lore.kernel.org/all/20241011095512.3667549-1-ruanjinjie@huawei.com/
>
>
> Out of the curiosity (and no need to respond if you don't feel like) -
> are you using the gts helpers in some of your project(s)? I am glad
> seeing these fixes coming in and just wondered if all these bugs are
> found because these helpers are being used outside the ROHM drivers :)
>
> Yours,
> -- Matti
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists