| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <0913d4ba-7298-4295-8ce0-8c38ddb9d5b6@huawei.com>
Date: Fri, 1 Nov 2024 14:24:40 +0800
From: Wang Liang <wangliang74@...wei.com>
To: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>
CC: <davem@...emloft.net>, <kuba@...nel.org>, <pabeni@...hat.com>,
<horms@...nel.org>, <dsahern@...nel.org>, <yuehaibing@...wei.com>,
<zhangchangzhong@...wei.com>, <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH net] net: fix data-races around sk->sk_forward_alloc
在 2024/10/31 22:08, Eric Dumazet 写道:
> On Thu, Oct 31, 2024 at 1:06 PM Wang Liang <wangliang74@...wei.com> wrote:
>> Syzkaller reported this warning:
> Was this a public report ?
Yes，I find the report here (the C repo in the url is useful):
https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?id=3e9b62ff331dcc3a6c28c41207f3b9911828a46b
>> [ 65.568203][ C0] ------------[ cut here ]------------
>> [ 65.569339][ C0] WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 16 at net/ipv4/af_inet.c:156 inet_sock_destruct+0x1c5/0x1e0
>> [ 65.575017][ C0] Modules linked in:
>> [ 65.575699][ C0] CPU: 0 UID: 0 PID: 16 Comm: ksoftirqd/0 Not tainted 6.12.0-rc5 #26
>> [ ...]
> Oh the horror, this is completely wrong and unsafe anyway.
>
> TCP listen path MUST be lockless, and stay lockless.
>
> Ask yourself : Why would a listener even hold a pktoptions in the first place ?
>
> Normally, each request socket can hold an ireq->pktopts (see in
> tcp_v6_init_req())
>
> The skb_clone_and_charge_r() happen later in tcp_v6_syn_recv_sock()
>
> The correct fix is to _not_ call skb_clone_and_charge_r() for a
> listener socket, of course, this never made _any_ sense.
>
> The following patch should fix both TCP and DCCP, and as a bonus make
> TCP SYN processing faster
> for listeners requesting these IPV6_PKTOPTIONS things.
Thank you very much for your suggestion and patch!
However, the problem remains unsolved when I use the following patch to
test.
Because skb_clone_and_charge_r() is still called when sk_state is
TCP_LISTEN in discard tag.
So I modify the patch like this (it works after local test):
diff --git a/net/dccp/ipv6.c b/net/dccp/ipv6.c
index da5dba120bc9..2d07f7385783 100644
--- a/net/dccp/ipv6.c
+++ b/net/dccp/ipv6.c
@@ -618,7 +618,7 @@ static int dccp_v6_do_rcv(struct sock *sk, struct
sk_buff *skb)
by tcp. Feel free to propose better solution.
--ANK (980728)
*/
- if (np->rxopt.all)
+ if (np->rxopt.all && (sk->sk_state != DCCP_LISTEN))
opt_skb = skb_clone_and_charge_r(skb, sk);
if (sk->sk_state == DCCP_OPEN) { /* Fast path */
diff --git a/net/ipv6/tcp_ipv6.c b/net/ipv6/tcp_ipv6.c
index d71ab4e1efe1..0ab06ed78cac 100644
--- a/net/ipv6/tcp_ipv6.c
+++ b/net/ipv6/tcp_ipv6.c
@@ -1618,7 +1618,7 @@ int tcp_v6_do_rcv(struct sock *sk, struct sk_buff
*skb)
by tcp. Feel free to propose better solution.
--ANK (980728)
*/
- if (np->rxopt.all)
+ if (np->rxopt.all && (sk->sk_state != TCP_LISTEN))
opt_skb = skb_clone_and_charge_r(skb, sk);
if (sk->sk_state == TCP_ESTABLISHED) { /* Fast path */
@@ -1656,8 +1656,6 @@ int tcp_v6_do_rcv(struct sock *sk, struct sk_buff
*skb)
if (reason)
goto reset;
}
- if (opt_skb)
- __kfree_skb(opt_skb);
return 0;
}
} else
> diff --git a/net/dccp/ipv6.c b/net/dccp/ipv6.c
> index da5dba120bc9a55c5fd9d6feda791b0ffc887423..d6649246188d72b3df6c74750779b7aa5910dcb7
> 100644
> --- a/net/dccp/ipv6.c
> +++ b/net/dccp/ipv6.c
> @@ -618,7 +618,7 @@ static int dccp_v6_do_rcv(struct sock *sk, struct
> sk_buff *skb)
> by tcp. Feel free to propose better solution.
> --ANK (980728)
> */
> - if (np->rxopt.all)
> + if (np->rxopt.all && sk->sk_state != DCCP_LISTEN)
> opt_skb = skb_clone_and_charge_r(skb, sk);
>
> if (sk->sk_state == DCCP_OPEN) { /* Fast path */
> diff --git a/net/ipv6/tcp_ipv6.c b/net/ipv6/tcp_ipv6.c
> index d71ab4e1efe1c6598cf3d3e4334adf0881064ce9..e643dbaec9ccc92eb2d9103baf185c957ad1dd2e
> 100644
> --- a/net/ipv6/tcp_ipv6.c
> +++ b/net/ipv6/tcp_ipv6.c
> @@ -1605,25 +1605,12 @@ int tcp_v6_do_rcv(struct sock *sk, struct sk_buff *skb)
> * is currently called with bh processing disabled.
> */
>
> - /* Do Stevens' IPV6_PKTOPTIONS.
> -
> - Yes, guys, it is the only place in our code, where we
> - may make it not affecting IPv4.
> - The rest of code is protocol independent,
> - and I do not like idea to uglify IPv4.
> -
> - Actually, all the idea behind IPV6_PKTOPTIONS
> - looks not very well thought. For now we latch
> - options, received in the last packet, enqueued
> - by tcp. Feel free to propose better solution.
> - --ANK (980728)
> - */
> - if (np->rxopt.all)
> - opt_skb = skb_clone_and_charge_r(skb, sk);
>
> if (sk->sk_state == TCP_ESTABLISHED) { /* Fast path */
> struct dst_entry *dst;
>
> + if (np->rxopt.all)
> + opt_skb = skb_clone_and_charge_r(skb, sk);
> dst = rcu_dereference_protected(sk->sk_rx_dst,
> lockdep_sock_is_held(sk));
>
> @@ -1656,13 +1643,13 @@ int tcp_v6_do_rcv(struct sock *sk, struct sk_buff *skb)
> if (reason)
> goto reset;
> }
> - if (opt_skb)
> - __kfree_skb(opt_skb);
> return 0;
> }
> } else
> sock_rps_save_rxhash(sk, skb);
>
> + if (np->rxopt.all)
> + opt_skb = skb_clone_and_charge_r(skb, sk);
> reason = tcp_rcv_state_process(sk, skb);
> if (reason)
> goto reset;
Powered by blists - more mailing lists