[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <pmgutki3fjqbka5ozalevpw7qptmzykhqxiaofqc2nh4gpnn4f@bgmz6fknavbf>
Date: Fri, 1 Nov 2024 08:26:04 +0100
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>
To: Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@...aro.org>
Cc: Bjorn Andersson <andersson@...nel.org>,
Konrad Dybcio <konradybcio@...nel.org>, Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>, Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>,
Krishna Kurapati <quic_kriskura@...cinc.com>, linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/4] dt-bindings: arm: qcom-soc: simplify SoC-matching
patterns
On Fri, Nov 01, 2024 at 02:49:22AM +0200, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
> The patterns for individual SoC families grew up to be pretty complex,
> containing lots of special cases and optional suffixes. Split them per
> the suffix to make it easier to extend SoC patterns.
This is doing something quite different - split is not important here.
Instead you narrow the patterns significantly and disallow things like
msm8994pro, sc8280p or sc8280px, and allow things like sa5200p.
I don't see here much of pattern simplifying - dropping (pro)? really
makes little difference.
Best regards,
Krzysztof
Powered by blists - more mailing lists