[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <0a15823f-d2b5-4b92-9a28-e3933394c907@kernel.org>
Date: Fri, 1 Nov 2024 09:34:24 +0100
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>
To: Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@...aro.org>
Cc: Amit Sunil Dhamne <amitsd@...gle.com>, robh@...nel.org,
krzk+dt@...nel.org, conor+dt@...nel.org, gregkh@...uxfoundation.org,
heikki.krogerus@...ux.intel.com, kyletso@...gle.com, rdbabiera@...gle.com,
badhri@...gle.com, linux@...ck-us.net, xu.yang_2@....com,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-usb@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 2/3] dt-bindings: usb: maxim,max33359.yaml: add usage
of sink bc12 time property
On 01/11/2024 08:59, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 01, 2024 at 08:09:52AM +0100, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>> On 01/11/2024 08:02, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>>> On Thu, Oct 31, 2024 at 04:59:53PM -0700, Amit Sunil Dhamne wrote:
>>>> Add usage of "sink-bc12-completion-time-ms" connector property to
>>>
>>> There is no such property. You cannot add it. You did not even
>>> test this patch before sending :/
>>>
>>
>> Sorry, now I see that's the patch 2, not 1. Somehow I thought you
>> started with it and I got confused.
>
> The question is why patch 2 generated the error even if it had patch 1
> in front of it?
I suspect patch #1 did not apply, because it depends on USB next tree.
Best regards,
Krzysztof
Powered by blists - more mailing lists