[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ZySU7bEvct4_FbBX@smile.fi.intel.com>
Date: Fri, 1 Nov 2024 10:44:29 +0200
From: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
To: Liu Peibao <loven.liu@...uarmicro.com>
Cc: Jarkko Nikula <jarkko.nikula@...ux.intel.com>,
Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@...ux.intel.com>,
Jan Dabros <jsd@...ihalf.com>, Andi Shyti <andi.shyti@...nel.org>,
"xiaowu . ding" <xiaowu.ding@...uarmicro.com>,
Angus Chen <angus.chen@...uarmicro.com>, linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH RESEND TO CC MAILLIST] i2c: designware: fix master
holding SCL low when I2C_DYNAMIC_TAR_UPDATE not set
On Fri, Nov 01, 2024 at 04:12:43PM +0800, Liu Peibao wrote:
> When Tx FIFO empty and last command with no STOP bit set, the master
> holds SCL low. If I2C_DYNAMIC_TAR_UPDATE is not set, BIT(13) MST_ON_HOLD
> of IC_RAW_INTR_STAT is not Enabled, causing the __i2c_dw_disable()
> timeout. This is quiet similar as commit 2409205acd3c ("i2c: designware:
> fix __i2c_dw_disable() in case master is holding SCL low") mentioned.
> Check BIT(7) MST_HOLD_TX_FIFO_EMPTY in IC_STATUS also which is available
> when IC_STAT_FOR_CLK_STRETCH is set.
Who are those people? Why Angus Chen is not a committer of the change?
Please, consult with the Submitting Patches documentation to clarify on these
tags.
Also, sounds to me that Fixes tag is needed.
--
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko
Powered by blists - more mailing lists