[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CA+i-1C0HKQS=SczTJEOsJLiUzhb60zAdi+27ey6VCLU5Ws9pfg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 1 Nov 2024 11:06:57 +0100
From: Brendan Jackman <jackmanb@...gle.com>
To: Junaid Shahid <junaids@...gle.com>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>, Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Sean Christopherson <seanjc@...gle.com>, Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>,
Alexandre Chartre <alexandre.chartre@...cle.com>, Liran Alon <liran.alon@...cle.com>,
Jan Setje-Eilers <jan.setjeeilers@...cle.com>, Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>, Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de>,
Lorenzo Stoakes <lstoakes@...il.com>, David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>, Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>,
Michal Hocko <mhocko@...nel.org>, Khalid Aziz <khalid.aziz@...cle.com>,
Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@...hat.com>, Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@...aro.org>,
Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@....com>, Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Valentin Schneider <vschneid@...hat.com>, Paul Turner <pjt@...gle.com>, Reiji Watanabe <reijiw@...gle.com>,
Ofir Weisse <oweisse@...gle.com>, Yosry Ahmed <yosryahmed@...gle.com>,
Patrick Bellasi <derkling@...gle.com>, KP Singh <kpsingh@...gle.com>,
Alexandra Sandulescu <aesa@...gle.com>, Matteo Rizzo <matteorizzo@...gle.com>, Jann Horn <jannh@...gle.com>,
x86@...nel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org,
kvm@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 01/26] mm: asi: Make some utility functions noinstr compatible
On Fri, 1 Nov 2024 at 02:44, Junaid Shahid <junaids@...gle.com> wrote:
> In any case, I guess we could just mark these functions as plain noinstr.
I wonder if it also would be worth having something like
/*
* Inline this function so it can be called from noinstr,
* but it wouldn't actually care itself about being instrumented.
*/
#define inline_for_noinstr __always_inline
Maybe there are already __always_inline functions this would apply to.
Then again, if you care about inlining them so much that you can't
just write "noinstr", then it's probably hot/small enough that
__always_inline would make sense regardless of noinstr.
Probably I'm over-thinking it at this point.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists