[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <274e1560-9f6c-4dd9-b27c-2fd0f0c54d03@huawei.com>
Date: Fri, 1 Nov 2024 14:54:27 +0300
From: Stepanov Anatoly <stepanov.anatoly@...wei.com>
To: Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.com>
CC: Gutierrez Asier <gutierrez.asier@...wei-partners.com>,
<akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, <david@...hat.com>, <ryan.roberts@....com>,
<baohua@...nel.org>, <willy@...radead.org>, <peterx@...hat.com>,
<hannes@...xchg.org>, <hocko@...nel.org>, <roman.gushchin@...ux.dev>,
<shakeel.butt@...ux.dev>, <muchun.song@...ux.dev>, <cgroups@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-mm@...ck.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
<alexander.kozhevnikov@...wei-partners.com>, <guohanjun@...wei.com>,
<weiyongjun1@...wei.com>, <wangkefeng.wang@...wei.com>,
<judy.chenhui@...wei.com>, <yusongping@...wei.com>, <artem.kuzin@...wei.com>,
<kang.sun@...wei.com>, <nikita.panov@...wei-partners.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 0/3] Cgroup-based THP control
On 11/1/2024 10:35 AM, Michal Hocko wrote:
> On Thu 31-10-24 17:37:12, Stepanov Anatoly wrote:
>> If we consider the inheritance approach (prctl + launcher), it's fine until we need to change
>> THP mode property for several tasks at once, in this case some batch-change approach needed.
>
> I do not follow. How is this any different from a single process? Or do
> you mean to change the mode for an already running process?
>
yes, for already running set of processes
--
Anatoly Stepanov, Huawei
Powered by blists - more mailing lists