[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <7be231c6-a5b6-41ec-b43d-cbba07e7c448@linaro.org>
Date: Fri, 1 Nov 2024 12:29:25 +0000
From: Bryan O'Donoghue <bryan.odonoghue@...aro.org>
To: Taniya Das <quic_tdas@...cinc.com>,
Michael Turquette <mturquette@...libre.com>, Stephen Boyd
<sboyd@...nel.org>, Bjorn Andersson <andersson@...nel.org>,
Abhishek Sahu <absahu@...eaurora.org>, Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>, Conor Dooley
<conor+dt@...nel.org>, Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>
Cc: Ajit Pandey <quic_ajipan@...cinc.com>,
Imran Shaik <quic_imrashai@...cinc.com>,
Jagadeesh Kona <quic_jkona@...cinc.com>, linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org,
linux-clk@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 04/11] clk: qcom: camcc-qcs615: Add QCS615 camera clock
controller driver
On 01/11/2024 10:38, Taniya Das wrote:
> + .vco_val = 0x2 << 20,
vco_val = BIT(21)
> + .vco_mask = 0x3 << 20,
Instead of bit shifting couldn't we just use GENMASK ?
Aside from anything else shifting a hex value by a decimal value isn't
the clearest code in the world.
vco_mask = GENMASK(21, 20)
Much cleaner.
drivers/clk/qcom/gcc-sm6115.c
Same comment for all of the bit-shifts in the series, I appreciate the
shifts are what the downstream code does but BIT/GENMASK does this job
better.
Once fixed you can add my
Reviewed-by: Bryan O'Donoghue <bryan.odonoghue@...aro.org>
to this file
---
bod
Powered by blists - more mailing lists