[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAHS8izO-UhDfctAsjpdipRV=WyCvUAu9VnAes0mBe2wSvV3_9g@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 1 Nov 2024 06:14:14 -0700
From: Mina Almasry <almasrymina@...gle.com>
To: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org, "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>, Simon Horman <horms@...nel.org>,
Jesper Dangaard Brouer <hawk@...nel.org>, Ilias Apalodimas <ilias.apalodimas@...aro.org>,
Shuah Khan <shuah@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v1 0/7] devmem TCP fixes
On Thu, Oct 31, 2024 at 7:42 PM Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org> wrote:
>
> On Tue, 29 Oct 2024 20:55:20 +0000 Mina Almasry wrote:
> > A few unrelated devmem TCP fixes bundled in a series for some
> > convenience (if that's ok).
>
> These two should go to net I presume? It's missing input validation.
>
> Either way you gotta repost either as two properly separate series,
> or combine them as one, cause right now they are neither and patchwork
> doesn't recognize they are related.
>
Yeah my apologies. I made a mistake posting the series and posted the
cover letter twice. Looks like that confused patchwork very much.
I'll also repost targeting net since these are fixes to existing code.
But what is the 'missing input validation'? Do you mean the input
validation for the SO_DEVMEM_DONTNEED API? That should be handled in
the patch "net: fix SO_DEVMEM_DONTNEED looping too long" in this
series, unless I missed something.
--
Thanks,
Mina
Powered by blists - more mailing lists