[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <874j4rnl26.fsf@kernel.org>
Date: Fri, 01 Nov 2024 14:24:49 +0100
From: Andreas Hindborg <a.hindborg@...nel.org>
To: "Tamir Duberstein" <tamird@...il.com>
Cc: "Miguel Ojeda" <miguel.ojeda.sandonis@...il.com>, "Miguel Ojeda"
<ojeda@...nel.org>, "Alex Gaynor" <alex.gaynor@...il.com>, "Boqun Feng"
<boqun.feng@...il.com>, "Gary Guo" <gary@...yguo.net>, Björn Roy Baron
<bjorn3_gh@...tonmail.com>, "Benno Lossin" <benno.lossin@...ton.me>,
"Alice Ryhl" <aliceryhl@...gle.com>, "Trevor Gross" <tmgross@...ch.edu>,
"Danilo Krummrich" <dakr@...nel.org>, <rust-for-linux@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/5] rust: reorder `ForeignOwnable` items
"Tamir Duberstein" <tamird@...il.com> writes:
> On Thu, Oct 31, 2024 at 8:40 AM Miguel Ojeda
> <miguel.ojeda.sandonis@...il.com> wrote:
>>
>> On Thu, Oct 31, 2024 at 1:23 PM Tamir Duberstein <tamird@...il.com> wrote:
>> >
>> > This change was part of the original patch. Do you prefer the code
>> > movement in the same commit?
>>
>> If we do it, please keep it separate, that is a good idea.
>>
>> However, I think Andreas means to avoid the movement at all,
>> regardless of which commit is used to do it.
>
> Understood. I'll update the commit message to explain that this also
> avoids inconsistency with the implementation in kbox.rs, which is
> already in this order.
>
> Andreas, please let me know if this is acceptable.
I would prefer not to move the code, but I am not going to make more
noise about it that this :) I don't care what order these items are, and
so to me it is just noise in the history.
Best regards,
Andreas Hindborg
Powered by blists - more mailing lists