linux-kernel - Re: [RFC PATCH 0/2] wcd937x codec fixes

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <D5AVPVHDHG9A.ARDI8CYMPNCN@linaro.org>
Date: Fri, 01 Nov 2024 13:33:43 +0000
From: "Alexey Klimov" <alexey.klimov@...aro.org>
To: "Mark Brown" <broonie@...nel.org>
Cc: <srinivas.kandagatla@...aro.org>, <quic_pkumpatl@...cinc.com>,
 <a39.skl@...il.com>, <quic_mohs@...cinc.com>,
 <linux-sound@...r.kernel.org>, <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>,
 <lgirdwood@...il.com>, <perex@...ex.cz>, <tiwai@...e.com>,
 <dmitry.baryshkov@...aro.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 0/2] wcd937x codec fixes

Hi Mark,

On Wed Oct 23, 2024 at 12:21 AM BST, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 22, 2024 at 04:31:29AM +0100, Alexey Klimov wrote:
> > This sent as RFC because of the following:
> > 
> > - regarding the LO switch patch. I've got info about that from two persons
> > independently hence not sure what tags to put there and who should be
> > the author. Please let me know if that needs to be corrected.
>
> The tags are fine there.
>
> Just as a general thing if two changes aren't directly related and don't
> overlap at all it's usually better to send them separately to avoid
> creating spurious dependencies which can slow down getting things
> reviewed and merged.

Thank you. Noted. Yes, they are technically independent. They were
somehow connected in my head, something like "both are needed to have
working audio with lesser troubles". I'll try to keep not related and
not overlapping things separated.

Best regards,
Alexey