lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ZyVxBbGYsEjifLgp@MiWiFi-R3L-srv>
Date: Sat, 2 Nov 2024 08:23:33 +0800
From: Baoquan He <bhe@...hat.com>
To: Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
Cc: Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@....com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	dyoung@...hat.com, daniel.kiper@...cle.com, noodles@...com,
	lijiang@...hat.com, kexec@...ts.infradead.org, x86@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/2] x86/mm: rename the confusing local variable in
 early_memremap_is_setup_data()

On 11/01/24 at 05:18pm, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 31, 2024 at 11:41:12AM +0800, Baoquan He wrote:
> > Should I send the fixing patch alone and clean up the useless argument
> > 'size' later, or squash them into one patch?
> 
> First the fix, then the cleanup.

Sure, will do. Thanks a lot.

> 
> Btw, that fix wants to go to stable no? Seeing how it breaks certain machines
> with IMA and kdump and SMe...

Yeah, it should be added to stable. Distros may get both SME/IMA set not
as early as the bug introduced, while anyone doing so in an earlier kernel
will see the problem.


Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ