[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20241102141914.GA3440781@rocinante>
Date: Sat, 2 Nov 2024 23:19:14 +0900
From: Krzysztof WilczyĆski <kw@...ux.com>
To: Siddharth Vadapalli <s-vadapalli@...com>
Cc: bhelgaas@...gle.com, lpieralisi@...nel.org, robh@...nel.org,
vigneshr@...com, manivannan.sadhasivam@...aro.org,
thomas.richard@...tlin.com, linux-omap@...r.kernel.org,
linux-pci@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, srk@...com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] PCI: j721e: Deassert PERST# after a delay of
PCIE_T_PVPERL_MS ms
Hello,
> According to Section 2.2 of the PCI Express Card Electromechanical
> Specification (Revision 5.1), in order to ensure that the power and the
> reference clock are stable, PERST# has to be deasserted after a delay of
> 100 milliseconds (TPVPERL). Currently, it is being assumed that the power
> is already stable, which is not necessarily true. Hence, change the delay
> to PCIE_T_PVPERL_MS to guarantee that power and reference clock are stable.
[...]
> This patch is based on commit
> c2ee9f594da8 KVM: selftests: Fix build on on non-x86 architectures
> of Mainline Linux.
Why KVM? Do you have the link to this commit handy?
[...]
> if (pcie->reset_gpio) {
> - fsleep(PCIE_T_PERST_CLK_US);
> + msleep(PCIE_T_PVPERL_MS);
fsleep() with the same macro and for the same reason is also used in the
j721e_pcie_probe() callback. I think, we would want both changed.
Krzysztof
Powered by blists - more mailing lists