linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] RDMA/bnxt_re: Fix some error handling paths in bnxt_re

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <173064974755.148662.8075604022466705654.b4-ty@kernel.org>
Date: Sun, 03 Nov 2024 11:02:27 -0500
From: Leon Romanovsky <leon@...nel.org>
To: Selvin Xavier <selvin.xavier@...adcom.com>, 
 Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...pe.ca>, 
 Kalesh AP <kalesh-anakkur.purayil@...adcom.com>, 
 Christophe JAILLET <christophe.jaillet@...adoo.fr>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org, 
 linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] RDMA/bnxt_re: Fix some error handling paths in
 bnxt_re_probe()


On Fri, 01 Nov 2024 17:10:56 +0100, Christophe JAILLET wrote:
> If bnxt_re_add_device() fails, 'en_info' still needs to be freed, as
> already done in the .remove() function.
> 
> The commit in Fixes incorrectly removed this call, certainly because it
> was expecting the .remove() function was called anyway. But if the probe
> fails, the remove function is not called.
> 
> [...]

Applied, thanks!

[1/2] RDMA/bnxt_re: Fix some error handling paths in bnxt_re_probe()
      https://git.kernel.org/rdma/rdma/c/cf90a4d1b9ff9e
[2/2] RDMA/bnxt_re: Remove some dead code
      https://git.kernel.org/rdma/rdma/c/aceee63a3aba46

Best regards,
-- 
Leon Romanovsky <leon@...nel.org>