[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <f5188173-21c4-4921-b7c8-5685c661a157@kernel.org>
Date: Sun, 3 Nov 2024 17:46:41 +0100
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>
To: Wenliang <wenliang202407@....com>, linux@...ck-us.net
Cc: book <book@...ask.localdomain>, jdelvare@...e.com,
linux-hwmon@...r.kernel.org, robh@...nel.org, krzk+dt@...nel.org,
conor+dt@...nel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@...rochip.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH linux dev-6.11 v3 2/2] dt-bindings: Add SY24655 to ina2xx
devicetree bindings
On 03/11/2024 17:39, Wenliang wrote:
> From: book <book@...ask.localdomain>
>
> SY24655 is similar to INA226. Its supply voltage and pin definitions
> are therefore the same. Compared to INA226, SY24655 has two additional
> registers for configuring and calculating average power.
>
> Signed-off-by: book <book@...ask.localdomain>
> Acked-by: Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@...rochip.com>
NAK, this never happened. If you think otherwise: provide proof, please.
Nothing improved in this binding, actually it got even worse with fake
email and probably name as well.
Best regards,
Krzysztof
Powered by blists - more mailing lists