[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20241103193845.2940988-1-andrew.kanner@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 3 Nov 2024 20:38:45 +0100
From: Andrew Kanner <andrew.kanner@...il.com>
To: mark@...heh.com,
jlbec@...lplan.org,
joseph.qi@...ux.alibaba.com
Cc: ocfs2-devel@...ts.linux.dev,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Andrew Kanner <andrew.kanner@...il.com>,
stable@...r.kernel.org,
syzbot+386ce9e60fa1b18aac5b@...kaller.appspotmail.com
Subject: [PATCH v2] ocfs2: remove entry once instead of null-ptr-dereference in ocfs2_xa_remove()
Syzkaller is able to provoke null-ptr-dereference in ocfs2_xa_remove():
[ 57.319872] (a.out,1161,7):ocfs2_xa_remove:2028 ERROR: status = -12
[ 57.320420] (a.out,1161,7):ocfs2_xa_cleanup_value_truncate:1999 ERROR: Partial truncate while removing xattr overlay.upper. Leaking 1 clusters and removing the entry
[ 57.321727] BUG: kernel NULL pointer dereference, address: 0000000000000004
[...]
[ 57.325727] RIP: 0010:ocfs2_xa_block_wipe_namevalue+0x2a/0xc0
[...]
[ 57.331328] Call Trace:
[ 57.331477] <TASK>
[...]
[ 57.333511] ? do_user_addr_fault+0x3e5/0x740
[ 57.333778] ? exc_page_fault+0x70/0x170
[ 57.334016] ? asm_exc_page_fault+0x2b/0x30
[ 57.334263] ? __pfx_ocfs2_xa_block_wipe_namevalue+0x10/0x10
[ 57.334596] ? ocfs2_xa_block_wipe_namevalue+0x2a/0xc0
[ 57.334913] ocfs2_xa_remove_entry+0x23/0xc0
[ 57.335164] ocfs2_xa_set+0x704/0xcf0
[ 57.335381] ? _raw_spin_unlock+0x1a/0x40
[ 57.335620] ? ocfs2_inode_cache_unlock+0x16/0x20
[ 57.335915] ? trace_preempt_on+0x1e/0x70
[ 57.336153] ? start_this_handle+0x16c/0x500
[ 57.336410] ? preempt_count_sub+0x50/0x80
[ 57.336656] ? _raw_read_unlock+0x20/0x40
[ 57.336906] ? start_this_handle+0x16c/0x500
[ 57.337162] ocfs2_xattr_block_set+0xa6/0x1e0
[ 57.337424] __ocfs2_xattr_set_handle+0x1fd/0x5d0
[ 57.337706] ? ocfs2_start_trans+0x13d/0x290
[ 57.337971] ocfs2_xattr_set+0xb13/0xfb0
[ 57.338207] ? dput+0x46/0x1c0
[ 57.338393] ocfs2_xattr_trusted_set+0x28/0x30
[ 57.338665] ? ocfs2_xattr_trusted_set+0x28/0x30
[ 57.338948] __vfs_removexattr+0x92/0xc0
[ 57.339182] __vfs_removexattr_locked+0xd5/0x190
[ 57.339456] ? preempt_count_sub+0x50/0x80
[ 57.339705] vfs_removexattr+0x5f/0x100
[...]
Reproducer uses faultinject facility to fail ocfs2_xa_remove() ->
ocfs2_xa_value_truncate() with -ENOMEM.
In this case the comment mentions that we can return 0 if
ocfs2_xa_cleanup_value_truncate() is going to wipe the entry
anyway. But the following 'rc' check is wrong and execution flow do
'ocfs2_xa_remove_entry(loc);' twice:
* 1st: in ocfs2_xa_cleanup_value_truncate();
* 2nd: returning back to ocfs2_xa_remove() instead of going to 'out'.
Fix this by skipping the 2nd removal of the same entry and making
syzkaller repro happy.
Cc: stable@...r.kernel.org
Fixes: 399ff3a748cf ("ocfs2: Handle errors while setting external xattr values.")
Reported-by: syzbot+386ce9e60fa1b18aac5b@...kaller.appspotmail.com
Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/all/671e13ab.050a0220.2b8c0f.01d0.GAE@google.com/T/
Tested-by: syzbot+386ce9e60fa1b18aac5b@...kaller.appspotmail.com
Signed-off-by: Andrew Kanner <andrew.kanner@...il.com>
---
Notes (akanner):
v2: remove rc check completely, suggested by Joseph Qi <joseph.qi@...ux.alibaba.com>
v1: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20241029224304.2169092-2-andrew.kanner@gmail.com/T/
fs/ocfs2/xattr.c | 3 +--
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/ocfs2/xattr.c b/fs/ocfs2/xattr.c
index dd0a05365e79..73a6f6fd8a8e 100644
--- a/fs/ocfs2/xattr.c
+++ b/fs/ocfs2/xattr.c
@@ -2036,8 +2036,7 @@ static int ocfs2_xa_remove(struct ocfs2_xa_loc *loc,
rc = 0;
ocfs2_xa_cleanup_value_truncate(loc, "removing",
orig_clusters);
- if (rc)
- goto out;
+ goto out;
}
}
--
2.43.5
Powered by blists - more mailing lists