linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH bpf] selftests/bpf: Add a copyright notice to lpm_trie_map_get_next

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <ZycSXwjH4UTvx-Cn@ub22>
Date: Sun, 3 Nov 2024 06:04:15 +0000
From: Byeonguk Jeong <jungbu2855@...il.com>
To: Hou Tao <houtao1@...wei.com>
Cc: andrii@...nel.org, daniel@...earbox.net, martin.lau@...ux.dev,
	Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>, bpf@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf] selftests/bpf: Add a copyright notice to
 lpm_trie_map_get_next_key

Hi,

The selftest "verifier_bits_iter/bad words" has been failed with
retval 115, while I did not touched anything but a comment.

Do you have any idea why it failed? I am not sure whether it indicates
any bugs in the kernel.

Best,
Byeonguk

On Sun, Nov 03, 2024 at 04:41:26AM +0000, bot+bpf-ci@...nel.org wrote:
> Dear patch submitter,
> 
> CI has tested the following submission:
> Status:     FAILURE
> Name:       [bpf] selftests/bpf: Add a copyright notice to lpm_trie_map_get_next_key
> Patchwork:  https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/netdevbpf/list/?series=905730&state=*
> Matrix:     https://github.com/kernel-patches/bpf/actions/runs/11648453401
> 
> Failed jobs:
> test_progs_no_alu32-s390x-gcc: https://github.com/kernel-patches/bpf/actions/runs/11648453401/job/32434970670
> 
> First test_progs failure (test_progs_no_alu32-s390x-gcc):
> #433 verifier_bits_iter
> tester_init:PASS:tester_log_buf 0 nsec
> process_subtest:PASS:obj_open_mem 0 nsec
> process_subtest:PASS:specs_alloc 0 nsec
> #433/13 verifier_bits_iter/bad words
> run_subtest:PASS:obj_open_mem 0 nsec
> run_subtest:PASS:unexpected_load_failure 0 nsec
> do_prog_test_run:PASS:bpf_prog_test_run 0 nsec
> run_subtest:FAIL:1035 Unexpected retval: 115 != 0
> 
> 
> Please note: this email is coming from an unmonitored mailbox. If you have
> questions or feedback, please reach out to the Meta Kernel CI team at
> kernel-ci@...a.com.