[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20241104145703.GA3230448@rocinante>
Date: Mon, 4 Nov 2024 23:57:03 +0900
From: Krzysztof WilczyĆski <kw@...ux.com>
To: Johan Hovold <johan@...nel.org>
Cc: Qiang Yu <quic_qianyu@...cinc.com>, manivannan.sadhasivam@...aro.org,
vkoul@...nel.org, kishon@...nel.org, robh@...nel.org,
andersson@...nel.org, konradybcio@...nel.org, krzk+dt@...nel.org,
conor+dt@...nel.org, mturquette@...libre.com, sboyd@...nel.org,
abel.vesa@...aro.org, quic_msarkar@...cinc.com,
quic_devipriy@...cinc.com, dmitry.baryshkov@...aro.org,
lpieralisi@...nel.org, neil.armstrong@...aro.org,
linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, linux-phy@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-pci@...r.kernel.org,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-clk@...r.kernel.org,
johan+linaro@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 3/5] PCI: qcom: Remove BDF2SID mapping config for
SC8280X family SoC
Hello,
[...]
> Would have been good to say something about why there are no 'iommu-map'
> properties on sc8280xp (e.g. since it uses an SMMUv3) as Bjorn
> suggested.
Happy to update the commit log directly if there is a consensus about how
the final wording should look like.
> > struct, namely ops_1_21_0 which is same as ops_1_9_0 except that it
> > doesn't have config_sid() callback to clean it up.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Qiang Yu <quic_qianyu@...cinc.com>
> > Reviewed-by: Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@...aro.org>
> > Reviewed-by: Manivannan Sadhasivam <manivannan.sadhasivam@...aro.org>
>
> I see that this patch has been picked up now. The above is already much
> better and I guess this is good enough for now:
>
> Reviewed-by: Johan Hovold <johan+linaro@...nel.org>
Added. Thank you!
Krzysztof
Powered by blists - more mailing lists