[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <7d2e421e-7fc1-4ce1-9081-7765bf71f7a3@intel.com>
Date: Mon, 4 Nov 2024 08:08:47 -0800
From: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...el.com>
To: Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>, "Chang S. Bae" <chang.seok.bae@...el.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, x86@...nel.org, tglx@...utronix.de,
mingo@...hat.com, dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC 4/7] x86/microcode/intel: Prepare for microcode
staging
On 11/4/24 03:16, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 01, 2024 at 09:10:39AM -0700, Chang S. Bae wrote:
>> +static inline u64 staging_addr(u32 cpu)
>> +{
>> + u32 lo, hi;
>> +
>> + rdmsr_on_cpu(cpu, MSR_IA32_MCU_STAGING_MBOX_ADDR, &lo, &hi);
>> + return lo | ((u64)hi << 32);
>> +}
> A single usage site. Move its code there and get rid of the function.
Yeah, and it'll look a lot nicer if you use:
rdmsrl_on_cpu(cpu, MSR_IA32_MCU_STAGING_MBOX_ADDR, &addr);
and don't have to do the high/lo munging.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists