[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20241104175953.535202-1-acme@kernel.org>
Date: Mon, 4 Nov 2024 14:59:51 -0300
From: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>
To: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...nel.org>,
Ian Rogers <irogers@...gle.com>,
Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@...el.com>,
Kan Liang <kan.liang@...ux.intel.com>,
Clark Williams <williams@...hat.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-perf-users@...r.kernel.org,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...hat.com>,
Athira Rajeev <atrajeev@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Howard Chu <howardchu95@...il.com>,
James Clark <james.clark@...aro.org>,
Leo Yan <leo.yan@...ux.dev>,
Thomas Richter <tmricht@...ux.ibm.com>,
Veronika Molnarova <vmolnaro@...hat.com>
Subject: [PATCH 0/2 perf-tools-next] 'perf test python' fixes/improvements
From: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...hat.com>
Hi,
While evaluating what is needed for having shell tests that test
python functionality conditionally, i.e. so that we don't try to test
the python binding if NO_LIBPYTHON=1 is used, I stumbled into these
problems.
The first patch its more for documenting that strange system()
behaviour and to check if this was something that would have
implications in other 'perf test' cases besides this python one, maybe
somebody will spot the problem, but at least it seems more compact now
using 'python -c inline-python-source'.
- Arnaldo
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo (2):
perf test python: Robustify the 'perf test python' test case
perf test: Don't build the python binding builtin test case with NO_LIBPYTHON=1
tools/perf/tests/Build | 2 +-
tools/perf/tests/builtin-test.c | 2 ++
tools/perf/tests/python-use.c | 4 ++--
tools/perf/tests/tests.h | 2 ++
4 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
--
2.47.0
Powered by blists - more mailing lists