lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20241104202008.GB361448-robh@kernel.org>
Date: Mon, 4 Nov 2024 14:20:08 -0600
From: Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>
To: Herve Codina <herve.codina@...tlin.com>
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>,
	Saravana Kannan <saravanak@...gle.com>,
	Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>, Lizhi Hou <lizhi.hou@....com>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-pci@...r.kernel.org,
	Allan Nielsen <allan.nielsen@...rochip.com>,
	Horatiu Vultur <horatiu.vultur@...rochip.com>,
	Steen Hegelund <steen.hegelund@...rochip.com>,
	Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@...tlin.com>,
	stable@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/6] PCI: of: Use device_{add,remove}_of_node() to attach
 of_node to existing device

On Mon, Nov 04, 2024 at 06:19:56PM +0100, Herve Codina wrote:
> The commit 407d1a51921e ("PCI: Create device tree node for bridge")
> creates of_node for PCI devices. The newly created of_node is attached
> to an existing device. This is done setting directly pdev->dev.of_node
> in the code.
> 
> Even if pdev->dev.of_node cannot be previously set, this doesn't handle
> the fwnode field of the struct device. Indeed, this field needs to be
> set if it hasn't already been set.
> 
> device_{add,remove}_of_node() have been introduced to handle this case.
> 
> Use them instead of the direct setting.
> 
> Fixes: 407d1a51921e ("PCI: Create device tree node for bridge")
> Cc: stable@...r.kernel.org

I don't think this is stable material. What exactly would is broken 
which would be fixed by just the first 2 patches?


> Signed-off-by: Herve Codina <herve.codina@...tlin.com>
> ---
>  drivers/pci/of.c | 4 ++--
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/pci/of.c b/drivers/pci/of.c
> index dacea3fc5128..141ffbb1b3e6 100644
> --- a/drivers/pci/of.c
> +++ b/drivers/pci/of.c
> @@ -655,8 +655,8 @@ void of_pci_remove_node(struct pci_dev *pdev)
>  	np = pci_device_to_OF_node(pdev);
>  	if (!np || !of_node_check_flag(np, OF_DYNAMIC))
>  		return;
> -	pdev->dev.of_node = NULL;
>  
> +	device_remove_of_node(&pdev->dev);
>  	of_changeset_revert(np->data);
>  	of_changeset_destroy(np->data);
>  	of_node_put(np);
> @@ -713,7 +713,7 @@ void of_pci_make_dev_node(struct pci_dev *pdev)
>  		goto out_free_node;
>  
>  	np->data = cset;
> -	pdev->dev.of_node = np;
> +	device_add_of_node(&pdev->dev, np);
>  	kfree(name);
>  
>  	return;
> -- 
> 2.46.2
> 

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ