[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.21.2411042349440.9262@angie.orcam.me.uk>
Date: Mon, 4 Nov 2024 23:51:05 +0000 (GMT)
From: "Maciej W. Rozycki" <macro@...am.me.uk>
To: Thorsten Blum <thorsten.blum@...ux.dev>
cc: Thomas Bogendoerfer <tsbogend@...ha.franken.de>,
linux-mips@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] MIPS: kernel: proc: Use str_yes_no() helper function
On Tue, 5 Nov 2024, Thorsten Blum wrote:
> > I like this cleanup, but now that it matters I suggest restructuring code
> > such that the latter `seq_printf' is converted as well.
>
> What about the comma and newline? Using str_yes_no() would remove them.
This is why a minor code restructuring is needed so that the comma and
the new line are produced elsewhere (arguably a cleaner structure anyway).
Maciej
Powered by blists - more mailing lists