linux-kernel - Re: linux-next: manual merge of the usb tree with the usb.current tree

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <2024110422-flyable-cautious-383c@gregkh>
Date: Mon, 4 Nov 2024 00:39:39 +0100
From: Greg KH <greg@...ah.com>
To: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
Cc: Amit Sunil Dhamne <amitsd@...gle.com>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Linux Next Mailing List <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the usb tree with the usb.current
 tree

On Fri, Nov 01, 2024 at 03:07:30PM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi all,
> 
> Today's linux-next merge of the usb tree got a conflict in:
> 
>   drivers/usb/typec/tcpm/tcpm.c
> 
> between commit:
> 
>   afb92ad8733e ("usb: typec: tcpm: restrict SNK_WAIT_CAPABILITIES_TIMEOUT transitions to non self-powered devices")
> 
> from the usb.current tree and commit:
> 
>   33a0302455d6 ("usb: typec: tcpm: Add support for parsing time dt properties")
> 
> from the usb tree.
> 
> I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary. This
> is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any non trivial
> conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer when your tree
> is submitted for merging.  You may also want to consider cooperating
> with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any particularly
> complex conflicts.
> 
> -- 
> Cheers,
> Stephen Rothwell
> 
> diff --cc drivers/usb/typec/tcpm/tcpm.c
> index 7ae341a40342,a8fcca029e78..000000000000
> --- a/drivers/usb/typec/tcpm/tcpm.c
> +++ b/drivers/usb/typec/tcpm/tcpm.c
> @@@ -5042,13 -5055,10 +5056,14 @@@ static void run_state_machine(struct tc
>   		if (port->vbus_never_low) {
>   			port->vbus_never_low = false;
>   			tcpm_set_state(port, SNK_SOFT_RESET,
> - 				       PD_T_SINK_WAIT_CAP);
> + 				       port->timings.sink_wait_cap_time);
>   		} else {
>  -			tcpm_set_state(port, SNK_WAIT_CAPABILITIES_TIMEOUT,
>  +			if (!port->self_powered)
>  +				upcoming_state = SNK_WAIT_CAPABILITIES_TIMEOUT;
>  +			else
>  +				upcoming_state = hard_reset_state(port);
> - 			tcpm_set_state(port, upcoming_state, PD_T_SINK_WAIT_CAP);
> ++			tcpm_set_state(port, upcoming_state,
> + 				       port->timings.sink_wait_cap_time);
>   		}
>   		break;
>   	case SNK_WAIT_CAPABILITIES_TIMEOUT:


Thanks, I"ll handle this when merging them together later this week.

greg k-h