linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] dt-bindings: mfd: bd71828: Use charger resistor in mOhm instead of MOhm

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20241104100019.1fbc38d8@akair>
Date: Mon, 4 Nov 2024 10:00:19 +0100
From: Andreas Kemnade <andreas@...nade.info>
To: Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>
Cc: lee@...nel.org, krzk+dt@...nel.org, conor+dt@...nel.org,
 mazziesaccount@...il.com, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
 linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, sre@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] dt-bindings: mfd: bd71828: Use charger resistor in mOhm
 instead of MOhm

Am Fri, 1 Nov 2024 14:27:05 -0500
schrieb Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>:

> On Tue, Oct 29, 2024 at 12:11:12PM +0100, Andreas Kemnade wrote:
> > Apparently there was some confusion regarding milliohm vs. megaohm.
> > (m/M). Use microohms to be able to properly specify the charger
> > resistor like other drivers do. This is not used yet by mainline
> > code yet. Specify a current sense resistor in milliohms range
> > rathes then megaohms range in the examples.  
> 
> milliohms?
> 
hmm, do not understand what you are after: Milliohms range:
I mean a value well expressed in milliohm (like 10-50mohm) in the
examples, but we use microohms to specify it like we often to, having
room for some unexpected precision requirements as we do in other
places also (microvolts for values more in mV/V range)

> rathes?

ok, simple typo: rather

Regards,
Andreas