[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAH5fLgisLyW-d9rsHJ8Vp8HpWh7PZxtkXooVQyMTxs445Ah4GQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 4 Nov 2024 10:31:49 +0100
From: Alice Ryhl <aliceryhl@...gle.com>
To: Abdiel Janulgue <abdiel.janulgue@...il.com>
Cc: rust-for-linux@...r.kernel.org, daniel.almeida@...labora.com,
a.hindborg@...nel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, dakr@...hat.com,
airlied@...hat.com, miguel.ojeda.sandonis@...il.com, wedsonaf@...il.com,
Andreas Hindborg <a.hindborg@...sung.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 2/2] rust: add dma coherent allocator abstraction.
On Mon, Nov 4, 2024 at 10:07 AM Abdiel Janulgue
<abdiel.janulgue@...il.com> wrote:
> +/// Abstraction of dma_alloc_coherent
> +///
> +/// # Invariants
> +///
> +/// For the lifetime of an instance of CoherentAllocation, the cpu address is a valid pointer
> +/// to an allocated region of consistent memory and we hold a reference to the device.
> +pub struct CoherentAllocation<T: Add> {
Requiring `T: Add` is very unusual. Why?
I don't even see any additions anywhere.
Alice
Powered by blists - more mailing lists