lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ec76fc73-79e5-4d09-ac4a-65efa60874fe@quicinc.com>
Date: Mon, 4 Nov 2024 19:14:59 +0800
From: Lei Wei <quic_leiwei@...cinc.com>
To: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
CC: "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Eric Dumazet
	<edumazet@...gle.com>, Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
        Paolo Abeni
	<pabeni@...hat.com>, Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
        Krzysztof Kozlowski
	<krzk+dt@...nel.org>,
        Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>,
        Heiner Kallweit
	<hkallweit1@...il.com>,
        Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>, <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
        <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        <quic_kkumarcs@...cinc.com>, <quic_suruchia@...cinc.com>,
        <quic_pavir@...cinc.com>, <quic_linchen@...cinc.com>,
        <quic_luoj@...cinc.com>, <srinivas.kandagatla@...aro.org>,
        <bartosz.golaszewski@...aro.org>, <vsmuthu@....qualcomm.com>,
        <john@...ozen.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 2/5] net: pcs: Add PCS driver for Qualcomm
 IPQ9574 SoC



On 11/1/2024 9:00 PM, Andrew Lunn wrote:
>> +config PCS_QCOM_IPQ
>> +	tristate "Qualcomm IPQ PCS"
> 
> Will Qualcomm only ever have one PCS driver?
> 
> You probably want a more specific name so that when the next PCS
> driver comes along, you have a reasonable consistent naming scheme.
> 

We expect one PCS driver to support the 'IPQ' family of Qualcomm 
processors. While we are initially adding support for IPQ9574 SoC, this 
driver will be easily extendable later to other SoC in the IPQ family 
such as IPQ5332, IPQ5424 and others. Therefore we used the name with 
suffix '_IPQ'. Hope it is fine.

> 	Andrew


Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ