linux-kernel - Re: [RFC PATCH 0/4] Alternative TPM patches for Trenchboot

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <D5DDQSZDIAEV.AFYLTCLRYRUQ@kernel.org>
Date: Mon, 04 Nov 2024 14:06:36 +0200
From: "Jarkko Sakkinen" <jarkko@...nel.org>
To: "Ard Biesheuvel" <ardb@...nel.org>, "Daniel P. Smith"
 <dpsmith@...rtussolutions.com>
Cc: <x86@...nel.org>, "Ross Philipson" <ross.philipson@...cle.com>, "Thomas
 Gleixner" <tglx@...utronix.de>, "Peter Huewe" <peterhuewe@....de>, "Jason
 Gunthorpe" <jgg@...pe.ca>, "open list:TPM DEVICE DRIVER"
 <linux-integrity@...r.kernel.org>, "open list"
 <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <trenchboot-devel@...glegroups.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 0/4] Alternative TPM patches for Trenchboot

On Mon Nov 4, 2024 at 1:55 PM EET, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
> But the inclusion of the secure launch module will force the TPM
> module to be builtin too, surely.

"config SECURE_LAUNCH" is bool => no export needed.

I have it in the patches too simply  because missed it.

BR, Jarkko