[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <D5DF0QIO2UZQ.29U999LYCC05M@rocinante>
Date: Mon, 04 Nov 2024 22:06:35 +0900
From: Krzysztof WilczyĆski <kw@...ux.com>
To: "AngeloGioacchino Del Regno" <angelogioacchino.delregno@...labora.com>,
<linux-pci@...r.kernel.org>
Cc: <ryder.lee@...iatek.com>, <jianjun.wang@...iatek.com>,
<lpieralisi@...nel.org>, <robh@...nel.org>, <bhelgaas@...gle.com>,
<matthias.bgg@...il.com>, <linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
<kernel@...labora.com>, <fshao@...omium.org>, "Manivannan Sadhasivam"
<manivannan.sadhasivam@...aro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 1/2] PCI: mediatek-gen3: Add support for setting
max-link-speed limit
Hello,
> + if (err > 0) {
You could drop > 0 here.
> + /* Get the maximum speed supported by the controller */
> + max_speed = mtk_pcie_get_controller_max_link_speed(pcie);
> +
> + /* Set max_link_speed only if the controller supports it */
> + if (max_speed >= 0 && max_speed <= err) {
> + pcie->max_link_speed = err;
> + dev_dbg(pcie->dev,
> + "Max controller link speed Gen%d, override to Gen%u",
> + max_speed, pcie->max_link_speed);
> + }
> + }
I wonder if this debug message would be better served as a warning to let
the user know that the speed has been overridden due to the platform
limitation. Thoughts?
Also, there is no need to sent a new series if you fine with the
suggestions. I will mend the code on the branch when applying.
Krzysztof
Powered by blists - more mailing lists