linux-kernel - Re: [RFC PATCH] docs/mm: add VMA locks documentation

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <ZyjQfG2YakYXLUdS@kernel.org>
Date: Mon, 4 Nov 2024 15:47:40 +0200
From: Mike Rapoport <rppt@...nel.org>
To: Lorenzo Stoakes <lorenzo.stoakes@...cle.com>
Cc: SeongJae Park <sj@...nel.org>, Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	"Liam R . Howlett" <Liam.Howlett@...cle.com>,
	Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>, Jann Horn <jannh@...gle.com>,
	Alice Ryhl <aliceryhl@...gle.com>,
	Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@...il.com>,
	Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>, linux-mm@...ck.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Suren Baghdasaryan <surenb@...gle.com>, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] docs/mm: add VMA locks documentation

On Mon, Nov 04, 2024 at 01:02:19PM +0000, Lorenzo Stoakes wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 01, 2024 at 04:48:32PM -0700, SeongJae Park wrote:
> >
> > This is the "Unsorted Documentation" section.  If the document is really for
> > the section, I'd suggest putting it in alphabetically sorted order, for the
> > consistency.  However, if putting the document under the section is not your
> > real intention, I think it might be better to be put under "Process Addresses"
> > section above.  What do you think?
> 
> Well, at the moment it's sort of a WIP thing that we may want to put under
> another section, was just putting there somewhat arbitrarily for now.
> 
> I also wanted to avoid too much debate about what to put where :P
> 
> But absolutely, ack, will either sort it there or put it somewhere more
> sensible, thanks!

Don't mean to bikeshed, but it would make sense to put it to the "Process
Address (space)" part :) 

-- 
Sincerely yours,
Mike.