[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20241105153733.GA7219@lst.de>
Date: Tue, 5 Nov 2024 16:37:33 +0100
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
To: Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>, kernel test robot <lkp@...el.com>,
Damien Le Moal <dlemoal@...nel.org>, oe-kbuild-all@...ts.linux.dev,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Hannes Reinecke <hare@...e.de>,
"Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@...cle.com>,
Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@....org>
Subject: Re: block/blk-zoned.c:579:5-24: WARNING: atomic_dec_and_test
variation before object free at line 583.
On Tue, Nov 05, 2024 at 08:36:33AM -0700, Jens Axboe wrote:
> On 11/5/24 8:34 AM, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> > On Tue, Nov 05, 2024 at 06:52:25AM +0800, kernel test robot wrote:
> >>>> block/blk-zoned.c:579:5-24: WARNING: atomic_dec_and_test variation before object free at line 583.
> >
> > Does anyone know what this warning is supposed to mean?
>
> It's supposed to mean "use refcount_t for things like this".
Have we finally resolved the performance problems with refcount_t for
fast path operations?
Powered by blists - more mailing lists