linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2] MIPS: kernel: proc: Use str_yes

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <AB524950-2672-406F-9141-28CE0A074181@linux.dev>
Date: Tue, 5 Nov 2024 18:51:23 +0100
From: Thorsten Blum <thorsten.blum@...ux.dev>
To: Thomas Bogendoerfer <tsbogend@...ha.franken.de>
Cc: "Maciej W. Rozycki" <macro@...am.me.uk>,
 linux-mips@...r.kernel.org,
 linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] MIPS: kernel: proc: Use str_yes_no() helper function

On 5. Nov 2024, at 18:38, Thorsten Blum wrote:
> Remove hard-coded strings by using the str_yes_no() helper function.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Thorsten Blum <thorsten.blum@...ux.dev>

Forgot the link to v1:

https://lore.kernel.org/r/20241102220437.22480-2-thorsten.blum@linux.dev/

And I just noticed the use of seq_printf(m,) vs. seq_puts(m,) and I'm
not sure this is still correct. Have to check this again later.

Sorry for the noise.