[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <173083052155.94172.6768091589461565148.b4-ty@kernel.org>
Date: Tue, 05 Nov 2024 18:15:21 +0000
From: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
To: Fei Shao <fshao@...omium.org>
Cc: AngeloGioacchino Del Regno <angelogioacchino.delregno@...labora.com>,
Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>,
Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@...il.com>, Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
Trevor Wu <trevor.wu@...iatek.com>, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org, linux-sound@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] ASoC: dt-bindings: mediatek,mt8188-mt6359: Add
mediatek,adsp property
On Tue, 05 Nov 2024 17:11:36 +0800, Fei Shao wrote:
> On some MediaTek SoCs, an Audio DSP (ADSP) is integrated as a separate
> hardware block that leverages Sound Open Firmware (SOF) and provides
> additional audio functionalities. This hardware is optional, and the
> audio subsystem will still function normally when it's not present.
>
> To enable ADSP support, a 'mediatek,adsp' property is required in the
> sound card node to pass the ADSP phandle. This allows AFE to link to
> ADSP when the sound card is probed.
>
> [...]
Applied to
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/broonie/sound.git for-next
Thanks!
[1/1] ASoC: dt-bindings: mediatek,mt8188-mt6359: Add mediatek,adsp property
commit: ed4bcfbcf45d02fa81c77cff86e914d71c1b3c1f
All being well this means that it will be integrated into the linux-next
tree (usually sometime in the next 24 hours) and sent to Linus during
the next merge window (or sooner if it is a bug fix), however if
problems are discovered then the patch may be dropped or reverted.
You may get further e-mails resulting from automated or manual testing
and review of the tree, please engage with people reporting problems and
send followup patches addressing any issues that are reported if needed.
If any updates are required or you are submitting further changes they
should be sent as incremental updates against current git, existing
patches will not be replaced.
Please add any relevant lists and maintainers to the CCs when replying
to this mail.
Thanks,
Mark
Powered by blists - more mailing lists