lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAN-5tyHo_3b7gGVnrnkr3J+tAYSUB=70UZyesAE4fEwOTzso4A@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 5 Nov 2024 17:40:49 -0500
From: Olga Kornievskaia <aglo@...ch.edu>
To: Jeff Layton <jlayton@...nel.org>
Cc: cel@...nel.org, Neil Brown <neilb@...e.de>, Dai Ngo <Dai.Ngo@...cle.com>, 
	Tom Talpey <tom@...pey.com>, Chuck Lever <chuck.lever@...cle.com>, 
	Olga Kornievskaia <okorniev@...hat.com>, linux-nfs@...r.kernel.org, 
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/2] nfsd: allow the use of multiple backchannel slots

On Tue, Nov 5, 2024 at 5:27 PM Jeff Layton <jlayton@...nel.org> wrote:
>
> On Tue, 2024-11-05 at 17:08 -0500, Olga Kornievskaia wrote:
> > Hi Jeff/Chuck,
> >
> > Hitting the following softlockup when running using nfsd-next code.
> > testing is same open bunch of file get delegations, do local
> > conflicting operation. Network trace shows a few cb_recalls occurring
> > successfully before the soft lockup (I can confirm that more than 1
> > slot was used. But I also see that the server isn't trying to use the
> > lowest available slot but instead just bumps the number and uses the
> > next one. By that I mean, say slot 0 was used and a reply came back
> > but the next callback would use slot 1 instead of slot 0).
> >
>
> If the slots are being consumed and not released then that's what you'd
> see. The question is why those slots aren't being released.
>
> Did the client return a SEQUENCE error on some of those callbacks? It
> looks like the slot doesn't always get released if that occurs, so that
> might be one possibility.

No sequence errors. CB_SEQUENCE and CB_RECALL replies are all successful.

> > [  344.045843] watchdog: BUG: soft lockup - CPU#0 stuck for 26s!
> > [kworker/u24:28:205]
> > [  344.047669] Modules linked in: rpcrdma rdma_cm iw_cm ib_cm ib_core
> > nfsd auth_rpcgss nfs_acl lockd grace uinput isofs snd_seq_dummy
> > snd_hrtimer vsock_loopback vmw_vsock_virtio_transport_common qrtr
> > rfkill vmw_vsock_vmci_transport vsock sunrpc vfat fat uvcvideo
> > snd_hda_codec_generic snd_hda_intel videobuf2_vmalloc snd_intel_dspcfg
> > videobuf2_memops uvc snd_hda_codec videobuf2_v4l2 snd_hda_core
> > snd_hwdep videodev snd_seq snd_seq_device videobuf2_common snd_pcm mc
> > snd_timer snd vmw_vmci soundcore xfs libcrc32c vmwgfx nvme
> > drm_ttm_helper ttm crct10dif_ce ghash_ce sha2_ce sha256_arm64
> > drm_kms_helper nvme_core sha1_ce sr_mod e1000e nvme_auth cdrom drm sg
> > fuse
> > [  344.050421] CPU: 0 UID: 0 PID: 205 Comm: kworker/u24:28 Kdump:
> > loaded Not tainted 6.12.0-rc4+ #42
> > [  344.050821] Hardware name: VMware, Inc. VMware20,1/VBSA, BIOS
> > VMW201.00V.21805430.BA64.2305221830 05/22/2023
> > [  344.051248] Workqueue: rpciod rpc_async_schedule [sunrpc]
> > [  344.051513] pstate: 11400005 (nzcV daif +PAN -UAO -TCO +DIT -SSBS BTYPE=--)
> > [  344.051821] pc : kasan_check_range+0x0/0x188
> > [  344.052011] lr : __kasan_check_write+0x1c/0x28
> > [  344.052208] sp : ffff800087027920
> > [  344.052352] x29: ffff800087027920 x28: 0000000000040000 x27: ffff0000a520f170
> > [  344.052710] x26: 0000000000000000 x25: 1fffe00014a41e2e x24: ffff0002841692c0
> > [  344.053159] x23: ffff0002841692c8 x22: 0000000000000000 x21: 1ffff00010e04f2a
> > [  344.053612] x20: ffff0002841692c0 x19: ffff80008318c2c0 x18: 0000000000000000
> > [  344.054054] x17: 0000006800000000 x16: 1fffe0000010fd60 x15: 0a0d37303736205d
> > [  344.054501] x14: 3136335b0a0d3630 x13: 1ffff000104751c9 x12: ffff600014a41e2f
> > [  344.054952] x11: 1fffe00014a41e2e x10: ffff600014a41e2e x9 : dfff800000000000
> > [  344.055402] x8 : 00009fffeb5be1d2 x7 : ffff0000a520f173 x6 : 0000000000000001
> > [  344.055735] x5 : ffff0000a520f170 x4 : 0000000000000000 x3 : ffff8000823129fc
> > [  344.056058] x2 : 0000000000000001 x1 : 0000000000000002 x0 : ffff0000a520f172
> > [  344.056479] Call trace:
> > [  344.056636]  kasan_check_range+0x0/0x188
> > [  344.056886]  queued_spin_lock_slowpath+0x5f4/0xaa0
> > [  344.057192]  _raw_spin_lock+0x180/0x1a8
> > [  344.057436]  rpc_sleep_on+0x78/0xe8 [sunrpc]
> > [  344.057700]  nfsd4_cb_prepare+0x15c/0x468 [nfsd]
> > [  344.057935]  rpc_prepare_task+0x70/0xa0 [sunrpc]
> > [  344.058165]  __rpc_execute+0x1e8/0xa48 [sunrpc]
> > [  344.058388]  rpc_async_schedule+0x90/0x100 [sunrpc]
> > [  344.058623]  process_one_work+0x598/0x1100
> > [  344.058818]  worker_thread+0x6c0/0xa58
> > [  344.058992]  kthread+0x288/0x310
> > [  344.059145]  ret_from_fork+0x10/0x20
> > [  344.075846] watchdog: BUG: soft lockup - CPU#1 stuck for 26s!
> > [kworker/u24:27:204]
> > [  344.076295] Modules linked in: rpcrdma rdma_cm iw_cm ib_cm ib_core
> > nfsd auth_rpcgss nfs_acl lockd grace uinput isofs snd_seq_dummy
> > snd_hrtimer vsock_loopback vmw_vsock_virtio_transport_common qrtr
> > rfkill vmw_vsock_vmci_transport vsock sunrpc vfat fat uvcvideo
> > snd_hda_codec_generic snd_hda_intel videobuf2_vmalloc snd_intel_dspcfg
> > videobuf2_memops uvc snd_hda_codec videobuf2_v4l2 snd_hda_core
> > snd_hwdep videodev snd_seq snd_seq_device videobuf2_common snd_pcm mc
> > snd_timer snd vmw_vmci soundcore xfs libcrc32c vmwgfx nvme
> > drm_ttm_helper ttm crct10dif_ce ghash_ce sha2_ce sha256_arm64
> > drm_kms_helper nvme_core sha1_ce sr_mod e1000e nvme_auth cdrom drm sg
> > fuse
> > [  344.079648] CPU: 1 UID: 0 PID: 204 Comm: kworker/u24:27 Kdump:
> > loaded Tainted: G             L     6.12.0-rc4+ #42
> > [  344.080290] Tainted: [L]=SOFTLOCKUP
> > [  344.080495] Hardware name: VMware, Inc. VMware20,1/VBSA, BIOS
> > VMW201.00V.21805430.BA64.2305221830 05/22/2023
> > [  344.080930] Workqueue: rpciod rpc_async_schedule [sunrpc]
> > [  344.081212] pstate: 21400005 (nzCv daif +PAN -UAO -TCO +DIT -SSBS BTYPE=--)
> > [  344.081630] pc : _raw_spin_lock+0x108/0x1a8
> > [  344.081815] lr : _raw_spin_lock+0xf4/0x1a8
> > [  344.081998] sp : ffff800087017a30
> > [  344.082146] x29: ffff800087017a90 x28: ffff0000a520f170 x27: ffff6000148a1081
> > [  344.082467] x26: 1fffe000148a1081 x25: ffff0000a450840c x24: ffff0000a520ed40
> > [  344.082892] x23: ffff0000a4508404 x22: ffff0002e9028000 x21: ffff800087017a50
> > [  344.083338] x20: 1ffff00010e02f46 x19: ffff0000a520f170 x18: 0000000000000000
> > [  344.083775] x17: 0000000000000000 x16: 0000000000000000 x15: 0000aaab024bdd10
> > [  344.084217] x14: 0000000000000000 x13: 0000000000000000 x12: ffff700010e02f4b
> > [  344.084625] x11: 1ffff00010e02f4a x10: ffff700010e02f4a x9 : dfff800000000000
> > [  344.084945] x8 : 0000000000000004 x7 : 0000000000000003 x6 : 0000000000000001
> > [  344.085264] x5 : ffff800087017a50 x4 : ffff700010e02f4a x3 : ffff800082311154
> > [  344.085587] x2 : 0000000000000001 x1 : 0000000000000000 x0 : 0000000000000000
> > [  344.085915] Call trace:
> > [  344.086028]  _raw_spin_lock+0x108/0x1a8
> > [  344.086210]  rpc_wake_up_queued_task+0x5c/0xf8 [sunrpc]
> > [  344.086465]  nfsd4_cb_prepare+0x168/0x468 [nfsd]
> > [  344.086694]  rpc_prepare_task+0x70/0xa0 [sunrpc]
> > [  344.086922]  __rpc_execute+0x1e8/0xa48 [sunrpc]
> > [  344.087148]  rpc_async_schedule+0x90/0x100 [sunrpc]
> > [  344.087389]  process_one_work+0x598/0x1100
> > [  344.087584]  worker_thread+0x6c0/0xa58
> > [  344.087758]  kthread+0x288/0x310
> > [  344.087909]  ret_from_fork+0x10/0x20
> >
> > On Wed, Oct 30, 2024 at 4:30 PM <cel@...nel.org> wrote:
> > >
> > > From: Chuck Lever <chuck.lever@...cle.com>
> > >
> > > On Wed, 30 Oct 2024 10:48:45 -0400, Jeff Layton wrote:
> > > > A few more minor updates to the set to fix some small-ish bugs, and do a
> > > > bit of cleanup. This seems to test OK for me so far.
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > > Applied to nfsd-next for v6.13, thanks! Still open for comments and
> > > test results.
> > >
> > > [1/2] nfsd: make nfsd4_session->se_flags a bool
> > >       commit: d10f8b7deb4e8a3a0c75855fdad7aae9c1943816
> > > [2/2] nfsd: allow for up to 32 callback session slots
> > >       commit: 6c8910ac1cd360ea01136d707158690b5159a1d0
> > >
> > > --
> > > Chuck Lever
> > >
> > >
>
> --
> Jeff Layton <jlayton@...nel.org>

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ