[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1bffa5f2ca0fec8a00f84ffab86dc6e8408af31c.camel@gmx.de>
Date: Tue, 05 Nov 2024 05:05:12 +0100
From: Mike Galbraith <efault@....de>
To: Phil Auld <pauld@...hat.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>, mingo@...hat.com,
juri.lelli@...hat.com, vincent.guittot@...aro.org,
dietmar.eggemann@....com, rostedt@...dmis.org, bsegall@...gle.com,
mgorman@...e.de, vschneid@...hat.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
kprateek.nayak@....com, wuyun.abel@...edance.com,
youssefesmat@...omium.org, tglx@...utronix.de
Subject: Re: [PATCH 17/24] sched/fair: Implement delayed dequeue
On Mon, 2024-11-04 at 08:05 -0500, Phil Auld wrote:
> On Sat, Nov 02, 2024 at 05:32:14AM +0100 Mike Galbraith wrote:
>
> >
> > The buddy being preempted certainly won't be wakeup migrated...
>
> Not the waker who gets preempted but the wakee may be a bit more
> sticky on his current cpu and thus stack more since he's still
> in that runqueue.
Ah, indeed, if wakees don't get scraped off before being awakened, they
can and do miss chances at an idle CPU according to trace_printk().
I'm undecided if overall it's boon, bane or even matters, as there is
still an ample supply of wakeup migration, but seems it can indeed
inject wakeup latency needlessly, so <sharpens stick>...
My box booted and neither become exceptionally noisy nor inexplicably
silent in.. oh, minutes now, so surely yours will be perfectly fine.
After one minute of lightly loaded box browsing, trace_printk() said:
645 - racy peek says there is a room available
11 - cool, reserved room is free
206 - no vacancy or wakee pinned
38807 - SIS accommodates room seeker
The below should improve the odds, but high return seems unlikely.
---
kernel/sched/core.c | 9 ++++++++-
1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
--- a/kernel/sched/core.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/core.c
@@ -3790,7 +3790,13 @@ static int ttwu_runnable(struct task_str
rq = __task_rq_lock(p, &rf);
if (task_on_rq_queued(p)) {
update_rq_clock(rq);
- if (p->se.sched_delayed)
+ /*
+ * If wakee is mobile and the room it reserved is occupied, let it try to migrate.
+ */
+ if (p->se.sched_delayed && rq->nr_running > 1 && cpumask_weight(p->cpus_ptr) > 1) {
+ dequeue_task(rq, p, DEQUEUE_SLEEP | DEQUEUE_DELAYED | DEQUEUE_NOCLOCK);
+ goto out_unlock;
+ } else if (p->se.sched_delayed)
enqueue_task(rq, p, ENQUEUE_NOCLOCK | ENQUEUE_DELAYED);
if (!task_on_cpu(rq, p)) {
/*
@@ -3802,6 +3808,7 @@ static int ttwu_runnable(struct task_str
ttwu_do_wakeup(p);
ret = 1;
}
+out_unlock:
__task_rq_unlock(rq, &rf);
return ret;
Powered by blists - more mailing lists