| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <ZylgYE2HXzGpAdKQ@google.com>
Date: Mon, 4 Nov 2024 16:01:36 -0800
From: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>
To: Chun-Tse Shao <ctshao@...gle.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com>,
Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...nel.org>, Ian Rogers <irogers@...gle.com>,
Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@...el.com>,
Liang Kan <kan.liang@...ux.intel.com>, Ze Gao <zegao2021@...il.com>,
Yang Jihong <yangjihong1@...wei.com>,
Weilin Wang <weilin.wang@...el.com>,
linux-perf-users@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/3] perf evsel: Improve the evsel__open_strerror for
EBUSY
Hello CT,
On Fri, Nov 01, 2024 at 09:17:55PM +0000, Chun-Tse Shao wrote:
> From: Ian Rogers <irogers@...gle.com>
>
> The existing EBUSY strerror message is:
> ```
> The sys_perf_event_open() syscall returned with 16 (Device or resource busy) for event (intel_bts//).
> "dmesg | grep -i perf" may provide additional information.
> ```
Just a nitpick. I'd like to avoid this github markdown style notation
of triple backticks as it doesn't clearly separate code blocks (IMHO)
nor protect anything like '#' sign in the beginning of a line.
I prefer indenting with 2 spaces before and after a blank line.
> The dmesg won't be useful. What is more useful is knowing what
> processes are potentially using the PMU, which some procfs scanning can
> reveal. When parallel testing tests/shell/stat_all_pmu.sh this yields:
> ```
> Testing intel_bts//
> Error:
> The PMU intel_bts counters are busy and in use by another process.
> Possible processes:
> 2585882 perf list
> 2585902 perf list -j -o /tmp/__perf_test.list_output.json.KF9MY
> 2585904 perf list
> 2585911 perf record -e task-clock --filter period > 1 -o /dev/null --quiet true
> 2585912 perf list
> 2585915 perf list
> 2586042 /tmp/perf/perf record -asdg -e cpu-clock -o /tmp/perftool-testsuite_report.dIF/perf_report/perf.data -- sleep 2
> 2589078 perf record -g -e task-clock:u -o - perf test -w noploop
> 2589148 /tmp/perf/perf record --control=fifo:control,ack -e cpu-clock -m 1 sleep 10
> 2589379 perf --buildid-dir /tmp/perf.debug.Umx record --buildid-all -o /tmp/perf.data.YBm /tmp/perf.ex.MD5.ZQW
> 2589568 perf record -o /tmp/__perf_test.program.mtcZH/perf.data --branch-filter any,save_type,u -- perf test -w brstack
> 2589649 perf record --per-thread -o /tmp/__perf_test.perf.data.5d3dc perf test -w thloop
> 2589898 perf record -o /tmp/perf-test-script.BX2b27Dcnj/pp-perf.data --sample-cpu uname
> ```
> Which gets a little closer to finding the issue.
>
> Signed-off-by: Ian Rogers <irogers@...gle.com>
> ---
> tools/perf/util/evsel.c | 79 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
> 1 file changed, 78 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/tools/perf/util/evsel.c b/tools/perf/util/evsel.c
> index dbf9c8cee3c56..9a5b6a6f8d2e5 100644
> --- a/tools/perf/util/evsel.c
> +++ b/tools/perf/util/evsel.c
> @@ -3286,6 +3286,78 @@ static bool find_process(const char *name)
> return ret ? false : true;
> }
>
> +static int dump_perf_event_processes(char *msg, size_t size)
> +{
> + DIR *proc_dir;
> + struct dirent *proc_entry;
> + int printed = 0;
> +
> + proc_dir = opendir(procfs__mountpoint());
> + if (!proc_dir)
> + return 0;
> +
> + /* Walk through the /proc directory. */
> + while ((proc_entry = readdir(proc_dir)) != NULL) {
> + char path[PATH_MAX];
Can we use a much smaller buffer as it expects PIDs only?
> + DIR *fd_dir;
> + struct dirent *fd_entry;
> + int fd_dir_fd;
> +
> + if ((proc_entry->d_type != DT_DIR) ||
> + !strcmp(".", proc_entry->d_name) ||
> + !strcmp("..", proc_entry->d_name))
Maybe something like this?
if (proc_entry->d_type != DT_DIR ||
!isdigit(proc_entry->d_name[0]) ||
strlen(proc_entry->d_name) > sizeof(path) - 4)
Thanks,
Namhyung
> + continue;
> +
> + scnprintf(path, sizeof(path), "%s/fd", proc_entry->d_name);
> + fd_dir_fd = openat(dirfd(proc_dir), path, O_DIRECTORY);
> + if (fd_dir_fd == -1)
> + continue;
> + fd_dir = fdopendir(fd_dir_fd);
> + if (!fd_dir) {
> + close(fd_dir_fd);
> + continue;
> + }
> + while ((fd_entry = readdir(fd_dir)) != NULL) {
> + ssize_t link_size;
> +
> + if (fd_entry->d_type != DT_LNK)
> + continue;
> + link_size = readlinkat(fd_dir_fd, fd_entry->d_name, path, sizeof(path));
> + if (link_size < 0)
> + continue;
> + /* Take care as readlink doesn't null terminate the string. */
> + if (!strncmp(path, "anon_inode:[perf_event]", link_size)) {
> + int cmdline_fd;
> + ssize_t cmdline_size;
> +
> + scnprintf(path, sizeof(path), "%s/cmdline", proc_entry->d_name);
> + cmdline_fd = openat(dirfd(proc_dir), path, O_RDONLY);
> + if (cmdline_fd == -1)
> + continue;
> + cmdline_size = read(cmdline_fd, path, sizeof(path) - 1);
> + close(cmdline_fd);
> + if (cmdline_size < 0)
> + continue;
> + path[cmdline_size] = '\0';
> + for (ssize_t i = 0; i < cmdline_size; i++) {
> + if (path[i] == '\0')
> + path[i] = ' ';
> + }
> +
> + if (printed == 0)
> + printed += scnprintf(msg, size, "Possible processes:\n");
> +
> + printed += scnprintf(msg + printed, size - printed,
> + "%s %s\n", proc_entry->d_name, path);
> + break;
> + }
> + }
> + closedir(fd_dir);
> + }
> + closedir(proc_dir);
> + return printed;
> +}
> +
> int __weak arch_evsel__open_strerror(struct evsel *evsel __maybe_unused,
> char *msg __maybe_unused,
> size_t size __maybe_unused)
> @@ -3319,7 +3391,7 @@ int evsel__open_strerror(struct evsel *evsel, struct target *target,
> printed += scnprintf(msg, size,
> "No permission to enable %s event.\n\n", evsel__name(evsel));
>
> - return scnprintf(msg + printed, size - printed,
> + return printed + scnprintf(msg + printed, size - printed,
> "Consider adjusting /proc/sys/kernel/perf_event_paranoid setting to open\n"
> "access to performance monitoring and observability operations for processes\n"
> "without CAP_PERFMON, CAP_SYS_PTRACE or CAP_SYS_ADMIN Linux capability.\n"
> @@ -3382,6 +3454,11 @@ int evsel__open_strerror(struct evsel *evsel, struct target *target,
> return scnprintf(msg, size,
> "The PMU counters are busy/taken by another profiler.\n"
> "We found oprofile daemon running, please stop it and try again.");
> + printed += scnprintf(
> + msg, size,
> + "The PMU %s counters are busy and in use by another process.\n",
> + evsel->pmu ? evsel->pmu->name : "");
> + return printed + dump_perf_event_processes(msg + printed, size - printed);
> break;
> case EINVAL:
> if (evsel->core.attr.sample_type & PERF_SAMPLE_CODE_PAGE_SIZE && perf_missing_features.code_page_size)
> --
> 2.47.0.163.g1226f6d8fa-goog
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists