linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v3 0/3] Apple SPI controller driver

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20241105074455.GA923511@robin.jannau.net>
Date: Tue, 5 Nov 2024 08:44:55 +0100
From: Janne Grunau <j@...nau.net>
To: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>
Cc: Hector Martin <marcan@...can.st>, Sven Peter <sven@...npeter.dev>,
	Alyssa Rosenzweig <alyssa@...enzweig.io>,
	Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>, Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
	Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>,
	Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>, asahi@...ts.linux.dev,
	linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-spi@...r.kernel.org,
	devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/3] Apple SPI controller driver

On Sat, Nov 02, 2024 at 02:11:51PM +0100, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 01, 2024 at 08:26:11PM +0100, Janne Grunau wrote:
> > Hi all,
> > 
> > This updated series address the review comments from the original
> > submission in 2021 [1]. It adds a new SPI controller driver for Apple
> > SoCs and is based on spi-sifive. It has been tested with the generic
> > jedec,spi-nor support and with a downstream driver for an Apple specific
> > HID over SPI transport.
> > 
> > As usual, I'm splitting off the MAINTAINERS and DT binding changes.
> > We would rather merge the MAINTAINERS change through the Asahi-SoC
> > tree to avoid merge conflicts as things trickle upstream, since
> > we have other submissions touching that section of the file.
> > 
> > The DT binding change can go via the SPI tree or via ours, but it's
> > easier if we merge it, as then we can make the DT changes to
> > instantiate it without worrying about DT validation failures depending
> > on merge order.
> > 
> > This is mostly Hector's work with a few minor changes to address review
> > comments from me.
> > 
> > [1] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-spi/20211212034726.26306-1-marcan@marcan.st/
> > 
> > v2:
> > - removed '#address-cells' and '#size-cells' from the bindings and added
> >   Rob's Rb:
> 
> Where?

Apparently only in my mind. fixed for v4

thanks,
Janne