linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] spi: Use of_property_present() for non-boolean properties

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <173081169520.26412.3733026868948680541.b4-ty@kernel.org>
Date: Tue, 05 Nov 2024 13:01:35 +0000
From: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
To: "Rob Herring (Arm)" <robh@...nel.org>
Cc: linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, linux-spi@...r.kernel.org, 
 linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] spi: Use of_property_present() for non-boolean
 properties

On Mon, 04 Nov 2024 13:07:59 -0600, Rob Herring (Arm) wrote:
> The use of of_property_read_bool() for non-boolean properties is
> deprecated in favor of of_property_present() when testing for property
> presence.
> 
> 

Applied to

   https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/broonie/spi.git for-next

Thanks!

[1/1] spi: Use of_property_present() for non-boolean properties
      commit: 270ddc23914ed79aa117373f4b3413c34cdabf12

All being well this means that it will be integrated into the linux-next
tree (usually sometime in the next 24 hours) and sent to Linus during
the next merge window (or sooner if it is a bug fix), however if
problems are discovered then the patch may be dropped or reverted.

You may get further e-mails resulting from automated or manual testing
and review of the tree, please engage with people reporting problems and
send followup patches addressing any issues that are reported if needed.

If any updates are required or you are submitting further changes they
should be sent as incremental updates against current git, existing
patches will not be replaced.

Please add any relevant lists and maintainers to the CCs when replying
to this mail.

Thanks,
Mark