[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20241106143328.GM10375@noisy.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Date: Wed, 6 Nov 2024 15:33:28 +0100
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: Mike Galbraith <efault@....de>
Cc: Phil Auld <pauld@...hat.com>, mingo@...hat.com, juri.lelli@...hat.com,
vincent.guittot@...aro.org, dietmar.eggemann@....com,
rostedt@...dmis.org, bsegall@...gle.com, mgorman@...e.de,
vschneid@...hat.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
kprateek.nayak@....com, wuyun.abel@...edance.com,
youssefesmat@...omium.org, tglx@...utronix.de
Subject: Re: [PATCH 17/24] sched/fair: Implement delayed dequeue
On Wed, Nov 06, 2024 at 03:14:58PM +0100, Mike Galbraith wrote:
> On Wed, 2024-11-06 at 14:53 +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> >
> > So... I was trying to make that prettier and ended up with something
> > like this:
>
> Passing ENQUEUE_DELAYED to dequeue_task() looks funky until you check
> the value, but otherwise yeah, when applied that looks better to me.
Yeah, it does look funneh, but we've been doing that for a long long
while.
Still, perhaps I should rename the shared ones to QUEUE_foo and only
have the specific ones be {EN,DE}QUEUE_foo.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists