linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] overlayfs: port all superblock creation logging to fsopen logs

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAJfpeguvAB-VMyV1Tin=ZDzPHE=P+ac4REQrsn4C5u8uh3+TmA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 6 Nov 2024 15:53:38 +0100
From: Miklos Szeredi <miklos@...redi.hu>
To: Amir Goldstein <amir73il@...il.com>
Cc: Christian Brauner <brauner@...nel.org>, Aleksa Sarai <cyphar@...har.com>, Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>, 
	linux-unionfs@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, 
	Karel Zak <kzak@...hat.com>, linux-fsdevel <linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] overlayfs: port all superblock creation logging to fsopen logs

> On Wed, Nov 6, 2024 at 12:00 PM Amir Goldstein <amir73il@...il.com> wrote:

> > I am not sure about the level of risk in this format change.
> > Miklos, WDYT?

I don't think the format change will cause problems, but it does fall
under the "no regressions" rule, so if something breaks then it needs
to be reverted.

> > I am not really sure if the discussion about suppressing the kmsg errors was
> > resolved or dismissed or maybe it only happened in my head??

All I found is this:

https://lore.kernel.org/all/CAOQ4uxhgWhe0NTS9p0=B+tqEjOgYKsxCFJd=iJb46M0MF04Gvw@mail.gmail.com/

I agree that this needs more thought.

Thanks,
Miklos