| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <007cfed1-111d-45aa-b873-24cca9d4af01@linux.intel.com>
Date: Wed, 6 Nov 2024 11:07:53 -0500
From: "Liang, Kan" <kan.liang@...ux.intel.com>
To: Colton Lewis <coltonlewis@...gle.com>, kvm@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Oliver Upton <oliver.upton@...ux.dev>,
Sean Christopherson <seanjc@...gle.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>,
Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>, Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com>,
Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...nel.org>, Ian Rogers <irogers@...gle.com>,
Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@...el.com>, Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>,
Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>, Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@...il.com>,
Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@...roup.eu>,
Naveen N Rao <naveen@...nel.org>, Heiko Carstens <hca@...ux.ibm.com>,
Vasily Gorbik <gor@...ux.ibm.com>, Alexander Gordeev
<agordeev@...ux.ibm.com>, Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@...ux.ibm.com>,
Sven Schnelle <svens@...ux.ibm.com>, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>, Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>,
x86@...nel.org, "H . Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
linux-perf-users@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org,
linux-s390@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 5/5] perf: Correct perf sampling with guest VMs
On 2024-11-05 2:56 p.m., Colton Lewis wrote:
> Previously any PMU overflow interrupt that fired while a VCPU was
> loaded was recorded as a guest event whether it truly was or not. This
> resulted in nonsense perf recordings that did not honor
> perf_event_attr.exclude_guest and recorded guest IPs where it should
> have recorded host IPs.
>
> Rework the sampling logic to only record guest samples for events with
> exclude_guest = 0. This way any host-only events with exclude_guest
> set will never see unexpected guest samples. The behaviour of events
> with exclude_guest = 0 is unchanged.
>
> Note that events configured to sample both host and guest may still
> misattribute a PMI that arrived in the host as a guest event depending
> on KVM arch and vendor behavior.
>
> Signed-off-by: Colton Lewis <coltonlewis@...gle.com>
> Acked-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>
> Reviewed-by: Oliver Upton <oliver.upton@...ux.dev>
> ---
> arch/arm64/include/asm/perf_event.h | 4 ----
> arch/arm64/kernel/perf_callchain.c | 28 ----------------------------
> arch/x86/events/core.c | 16 ++++------------
> include/linux/perf_event.h | 21 +++++++++++++++++++--
> kernel/events/core.c | 21 +++++++++++++++++----
> 5 files changed, 40 insertions(+), 50 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/perf_event.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/perf_event.h
> index 31a5584ed423..ee45b4e77347 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/perf_event.h
> +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/perf_event.h
> @@ -10,10 +10,6 @@
> #include <asm/ptrace.h>
>
> #ifdef CONFIG_PERF_EVENTS
> -struct pt_regs;
> -extern unsigned long perf_arch_instruction_pointer(struct pt_regs *regs);
> -extern unsigned long perf_arch_misc_flags(struct pt_regs *regs);
> -#define perf_arch_misc_flags(regs) perf_misc_flags(regs)
> #define perf_arch_bpf_user_pt_regs(regs) ®s->user_regs
> #endif
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/perf_callchain.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/perf_callchain.c
> index 01a9d08fc009..9b7f26b128b5 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/kernel/perf_callchain.c
> +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/perf_callchain.c
> @@ -38,31 +38,3 @@ void perf_callchain_kernel(struct perf_callchain_entry_ctx *entry,
>
> arch_stack_walk(callchain_trace, entry, current, regs);
> }
> -
> -unsigned long perf_arch_instruction_pointer(struct pt_regs *regs)
> -{
> - if (perf_guest_state())
> - return perf_guest_get_ip();
> -
> - return instruction_pointer(regs);
> -}
> -
> -unsigned long perf_arch_misc_flags(struct pt_regs *regs)
> -{
> - unsigned int guest_state = perf_guest_state();
> - int misc = 0;
> -
> - if (guest_state) {
> - if (guest_state & PERF_GUEST_USER)
> - misc |= PERF_RECORD_MISC_GUEST_USER;
> - else
> - misc |= PERF_RECORD_MISC_GUEST_KERNEL;
> - } else {
> - if (user_mode(regs))
> - misc |= PERF_RECORD_MISC_USER;
> - else
> - misc |= PERF_RECORD_MISC_KERNEL;
> - }
> -
> - return misc;
> -}
> diff --git a/arch/x86/events/core.c b/arch/x86/events/core.c
> index 24910c625e3d..aae0c5eabf09 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/events/core.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/events/core.c
> @@ -3005,9 +3005,6 @@ static unsigned long code_segment_base(struct pt_regs *regs)
>
> unsigned long perf_arch_instruction_pointer(struct pt_regs *regs)
> {
> - if (perf_guest_state())
> - return perf_guest_get_ip();
> -
> return regs->ip + code_segment_base(regs);
> }
>
> @@ -3034,17 +3031,12 @@ unsigned long perf_arch_guest_misc_flags(struct pt_regs *regs)
>
> unsigned long perf_arch_misc_flags(struct pt_regs *regs)
> {
> - unsigned int guest_state = perf_guest_state();
> unsigned long misc = common_misc_flags(regs);
>
> - if (guest_state) {
> - misc |= perf_arch_guest_misc_flags(regs);
> - } else {
> - if (user_mode(regs))
> - misc |= PERF_RECORD_MISC_USER;
> - else
> - misc |= PERF_RECORD_MISC_KERNEL;
> - }
> + if (user_mode(regs))
> + misc |= PERF_RECORD_MISC_USER;
> + else
> + misc |= PERF_RECORD_MISC_KERNEL;
>
> return misc;
> }
> diff --git a/include/linux/perf_event.h b/include/linux/perf_event.h
> index 772ad352856b..e207acdd9e73 100644
> --- a/include/linux/perf_event.h
> +++ b/include/linux/perf_event.h
> @@ -1655,8 +1655,9 @@ extern void perf_tp_event(u16 event_type, u64 count, void *record,
> struct task_struct *task);
> extern void perf_bp_event(struct perf_event *event, void *data);
>
> -extern unsigned long perf_misc_flags(struct pt_regs *regs);
> -extern unsigned long perf_instruction_pointer(struct pt_regs *regs);
> +extern unsigned long perf_misc_flags(struct perf_event *event, struct pt_regs *regs);
> +extern unsigned long perf_instruction_pointer(struct perf_event *event,
> + struct pt_regs *regs);
>
> #ifndef perf_arch_misc_flags
> # define perf_arch_misc_flags(regs) \
> @@ -1667,6 +1668,22 @@ extern unsigned long perf_instruction_pointer(struct pt_regs *regs);
> # define perf_arch_bpf_user_pt_regs(regs) regs
> #endif
>
> +#ifndef perf_arch_guest_misc_flags
> +static inline unsigned long perf_arch_guest_misc_flags(struct pt_regs *regs)
> +{
> + unsigned long guest_state = perf_guest_state();
> +
> + if (guest_state & PERF_GUEST_USER)
> + return PERF_RECORD_MISC_GUEST_USER;
> +
> + if (guest_state & PERF_GUEST_ACTIVE)
> + return PERF_RECORD_MISC_GUEST_KERNEL;
Is there by any chance to add a PERF_GUEST_KERNEL flag in KVM?
The PERF_GUEST_ACTIVE flag check looks really confusing.
Thanks,
Kan
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +# define perf_arch_guest_misc_flags(regs) perf_arch_guest_misc_flags(regs)
> +#endif
> +
> static inline bool has_branch_stack(struct perf_event *event)
> {
> return event->attr.sample_type & PERF_SAMPLE_BRANCH_STACK;
> diff --git a/kernel/events/core.c b/kernel/events/core.c
> index 2c44ffd6f4d8..c62164a2ff23 100644
> --- a/kernel/events/core.c
> +++ b/kernel/events/core.c
> @@ -7022,13 +7022,26 @@ void perf_unregister_guest_info_callbacks(struct perf_guest_info_callbacks *cbs)
> EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(perf_unregister_guest_info_callbacks);
> #endif
>
> -unsigned long perf_misc_flags(struct pt_regs *regs)
> +static bool should_sample_guest(struct perf_event *event)
> {
> + return !event->attr.exclude_guest && perf_guest_state();
> +}
> +
> +unsigned long perf_misc_flags(struct perf_event *event,
> + struct pt_regs *regs)
> +{
> + if (should_sample_guest(event))
> + return perf_arch_guest_misc_flags(regs);
> +
> return perf_arch_misc_flags(regs);
> }
>
> -unsigned long perf_instruction_pointer(struct pt_regs *regs)
> +unsigned long perf_instruction_pointer(struct perf_event *event,
> + struct pt_regs *regs)
> {
> + if (should_sample_guest(event))
> + return perf_guest_get_ip();
> +
> return perf_arch_instruction_pointer(regs);
> }
>
> @@ -7849,7 +7862,7 @@ void perf_prepare_sample(struct perf_sample_data *data,
> __perf_event_header__init_id(data, event, filtered_sample_type);
>
> if (filtered_sample_type & PERF_SAMPLE_IP) {
> - data->ip = perf_instruction_pointer(regs);
> + data->ip = perf_instruction_pointer(event, regs);
> data->sample_flags |= PERF_SAMPLE_IP;
> }
>
> @@ -8013,7 +8026,7 @@ void perf_prepare_header(struct perf_event_header *header,
> {
> header->type = PERF_RECORD_SAMPLE;
> header->size = perf_sample_data_size(data, event);
> - header->misc = perf_misc_flags(regs);
> + header->misc = perf_misc_flags(event, regs);
>
> /*
> * If you're adding more sample types here, you likely need to do
Powered by blists - more mailing lists