linux-kernel - Re: [ANNOUNCE v2] work tree for untorn filesystem writes

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20241106161541.GN2386201@frogsfrogsfrogs>
Date: Wed, 6 Nov 2024 08:15:41 -0800
From: "Darrick J. Wong" <djwong@...nel.org>
To: Christian Brauner <brauner@...nel.org>
Cc: "Ritesh Harjani (IBM)" <ritesh.list@...il.com>,
	John Garry <john.g.garry@...cle.com>,
	Catherine Hoang <catherine.hoang@...cle.com>,
	linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org, Theodore Ts'o <tytso@....edu>,
	Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>, Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
	Ojaswin Mujoo <ojaswin@...ux.ibm.com>, linux-block@...r.kernel.org,
	Dave Chinner <david@...morbit.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-xfs@...r.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [ANNOUNCE v2] work tree for untorn filesystem writes

On Wed, Nov 06, 2024 at 10:50:21AM +0100, Christian Brauner wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 05, 2024 at 04:57:40PM -0800, Darrick J. Wong wrote:
> > Hi everyone,
> > 
> > Here's a slightly updated working branch for the filesystem side of
> > atomic write changes for 6.13:
> > 
> > https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/djwong/xfs-linux.git/log/?h=fs-atomic_2024-11-05
> > 
> > This branch is, like yesterday's, based off of axboe's
> > for-6.13/block-atomic branch:
> > 
> > https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/axboe/linux-block.git/log/?h=for-6.13/block-atomic
> > 
> > The only difference is that I added Ojaswin's Tested-by: tags to the end
> > of the xfs series.  I have done basic testing with the shell script at
> > the end of this email and am satisfied that it at least seems to do the
> > (limited) things that I think we're targeting for 6.13.
> > 
> > Christian: Could you pull this fs-atomic branch into your vfs.git work
> > for 6.13, please?
> 
> Of course!
> 
> I did git pull fs-atomic_2024-11-05 from your tree. It should show up in
> -next tomorrow.

Yay, thank you!!

--D