[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAJ-ks9kNmH2t2Lo2PdLuH5rwSC3UQRGWd-cTAX9-Q2FE6oGHiQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 6 Nov 2024 12:32:24 -0400
From: Tamir Duberstein <tamird@...il.com>
To: Miguel Ojeda <miguel.ojeda.sandonis@...il.com>
Cc: Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@...il.com>, Miguel Ojeda <ojeda@...nel.org>,
Alex Gaynor <alex.gaynor@...il.com>, Gary Guo <gary@...yguo.net>,
Björn Roy Baron <bjorn3_gh@...tonmail.com>,
Benno Lossin <benno.lossin@...ton.me>, Andreas Hindborg <a.hindborg@...nel.org>,
Alice Ryhl <aliceryhl@...gle.com>, Trevor Gross <tmgross@...ch.edu>, rust-for-linux@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] rust: arc: remove unused PhantomData
On Wed, Nov 6, 2024 at 11:38 AM Miguel Ojeda
<miguel.ojeda.sandonis@...il.com> wrote:
>
> On Tue, Nov 5, 2024 at 9:13 PM Tamir Duberstein <tamird@...il.com> wrote:
> >
> > Doing a bit of archaeology I found the reasoning for the presence of
>
> What I meant by "in the past" is that, before the Rust RFC that
> changed it, the `PhantomData` would have been needed as far as I
> understand it, since having the `Drop` wouldn't have been enough.
I would be happy to add the relevant details to the commit message but
this is one citation that I haven't been able to locate. The closest
mention I could find[0] only vaguely mentions that this change was
made, but does not reference a commit (and certainly not an RFC).
Link: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/27730#issuecomment-316411459 [0]
Powered by blists - more mailing lists