[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <2b731ba8-1b6b-41eb-bae9-3403555506ef@roeck-us.net>
Date: Wed, 6 Nov 2024 08:43:54 -0800
From: Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>
To: Conor Dooley <conor@...nel.org>
Cc: Cedric Encarnacion <cedricjustine.encarnacion@...log.com>,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org,
linux-hwmon@...r.kernel.org, Jean Delvare <jdelvare@...e.com>,
Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
Delphine CC Chiu <Delphine_CC_Chiu@...ynn.com>, Rob Herring
<robh@...nel.org>, Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>,
Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>, Peter Yin <peteryin.openbmc@...il.com>,
Noah Wang <noahwang.wang@...look.com>, Marek Vasut <marex@...x.de>,
Lukas Wunner <lukas@...ner.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] dt-bindings: trivial-devices: add ltp8800
On 11/6/24 08:11, Conor Dooley wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 06, 2024 at 04:06:02PM +0000, Conor Dooley wrote:
>> On Tue, Nov 05, 2024 at 08:34:01PM -0800, Guenter Roeck wrote:
>>> On 11/5/24 19:09, Cedric Encarnacion wrote:
>>>> Add Analog Devices LTP8800-1A, LTP8800-2, and LTP8800-4A DC/DC μModule
>>>> regulator.
>>
>> A single compatible for 3 devices is highly suspect. What is
>> different between these devices?
>
> Additionally, looking at one of the datasheets, this has several inputs
> that could be controlled by a GPIO, a clock input and several supply
> inputs. It also has a regulator output. I don't think it is suitable for
> trivial-devices.yaml.
>
All PMBus devices are by definition regulators with input and output voltages.
After all, PMBus stands for "Power Management Bus". Some of them are listed
in trivial devices, some are not. Is that a general guidance, or in other
words should I (we) automatically reject patches adding PMBus devices
to the trivial devices file ?
Thanks,
Guenter
Powered by blists - more mailing lists