[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20241106172044.GO10375@noisy.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Date: Wed, 6 Nov 2024 18:20:44 +0100
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, x86@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] sched, x86: Update the comment for TIF_NEED_RESCHED_LAZY.
On Wed, Nov 06, 2024 at 05:24:49PM +0100, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote:
> Add the "Lazy" part to the comment for TIF_NEED_RESCHED_LAZY so it is
> not the same as TIF_NEED_RESCHED.
But it is lazy to copy/paste and not bother with comments, right? :-)
Thanks!
> Signed-off-by: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de>
> ---
> arch/x86/include/asm/thread_info.h | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/thread_info.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/thread_info.h
> index 75bb390f7baf5..a55c214f3ba64 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/include/asm/thread_info.h
> +++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/thread_info.h
> @@ -87,7 +87,7 @@ struct thread_info {
> #define TIF_NOTIFY_RESUME 1 /* callback before returning to user */
> #define TIF_SIGPENDING 2 /* signal pending */
> #define TIF_NEED_RESCHED 3 /* rescheduling necessary */
> -#define TIF_NEED_RESCHED_LAZY 4 /* rescheduling necessary */
> +#define TIF_NEED_RESCHED_LAZY 4 /* Lazy rescheduling needed */
> #define TIF_SINGLESTEP 5 /* reenable singlestep on user return*/
> #define TIF_SSBD 6 /* Speculative store bypass disable */
> #define TIF_SPEC_IB 9 /* Indirect branch speculation mitigation */
> --
> 2.45.2
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists