lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <10b48a82-fd30-4dd9-a19a-976e76dd0c8d@linux.intel.com>
Date: Wed, 6 Nov 2024 13:48:56 -0500
From: "Liang, Kan" <kan.liang@...ux.intel.com>
To: Ian Rogers <irogers@...gle.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
 Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>,
 Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>, Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
 Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com>,
 Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...nel.org>, Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@...el.com>,
 linux-perf-users@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
 Perry Taylor <perry.taylor@...el.com>, Samantha Alt
 <samantha.alt@...el.com>, Caleb Biggers <caleb.biggers@...el.com>,
 Weilin Wang <weilin.wang@...el.com>, Edward Baker <edward.baker@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 06/22] perf jevents: Add tsx metric group for Intel
 models



On 2024-11-06 1:15 p.m., Ian Rogers wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 6, 2024 at 9:53 AM Liang, Kan <kan.liang@...ux.intel.com> wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> On 2024-09-26 1:50 p.m., Ian Rogers wrote:
>>> Allow duplicated metric to be dropped from json files. Detect when TSX
>>> is supported by a model by using the json events, use sysfs events at
>>> runtime as hypervisors, etc. may disable TSX.
>>>
>>> Add CheckPmu to metric to determine if which PMUs have been associated
>>> with the loaded events.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Ian Rogers <irogers@...gle.com>
>>> ---
>>>  tools/perf/pmu-events/intel_metrics.py | 52 +++++++++++++++++++++++++-
>>>  1 file changed, 51 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/tools/perf/pmu-events/intel_metrics.py b/tools/perf/pmu-events/intel_metrics.py
>>> index f34b4230a4ee..58e243695f0a 100755
>>> --- a/tools/perf/pmu-events/intel_metrics.py
>>> +++ b/tools/perf/pmu-events/intel_metrics.py
>>> @@ -1,12 +1,13 @@
>>>  #!/usr/bin/env python3
>>>  # SPDX-License-Identifier: (LGPL-2.1 OR BSD-2-Clause)
>>> -from metric import (d_ratio, has_event, max, Event, JsonEncodeMetric,
>>> +from metric import (d_ratio, has_event, max, CheckPmu, Event, JsonEncodeMetric,
>>>                      JsonEncodeMetricGroupDescriptions, LoadEvents, Metric,
>>>                      MetricGroup, MetricRef, Select)
>>>  import argparse
>>>  import json
>>>  import math
>>>  import os
>>> +from typing import Optional
>>>
>>>  # Global command line arguments.
>>>  _args = None
>>> @@ -74,6 +75,54 @@ def Smi() -> MetricGroup:
>>>      ], description = 'System Management Interrupt metrics')
>>>
>>>
>>> +def Tsx() -> Optional[MetricGroup]:
>>> +  pmu = "cpu_core" if CheckPmu("cpu_core") else "cpu"
>>> +  cycles = Event('cycles')
>>
>> Isn't the pmu prefix required for cycles as well?
> 
> Makes sense.
> 
>>> +  cycles_in_tx = Event(f'{pmu}/cycles\-t/')
>>> +  cycles_in_tx_cp = Event(f'{pmu}/cycles\-ct/')
>>> +  try:
>>> +    # Test if the tsx event is present in the json, prefer the
>>> +    # sysfs version so that we can detect its presence at runtime.
>>> +    transaction_start = Event("RTM_RETIRED.START")
>>> +    transaction_start = Event(f'{pmu}/tx\-start/')
>>
>> What's the difference between this check and the later has_event() check?
>>
>> All the tsx related events are model-specific events. We should check
>> them all before using it.
> 
> So if there is PMU in the Event name then the Event logic assumes you
> are using sysfs and doesn't check the event exists in json. As you
> say, I needed a way to detect does this model support TSX? I wanted to
> avoid a model lookup table, so I used the existence of
> RTM_RETIRED.START for a model as the way to determine if the model
> supports TSX. Once we know we have a model supporting TSX then we use
> the sysfs event name and has_event check, so that if the TSX and the
> event have been disabled the metric doesn't fail parsing.
> 
> So, the first check is a compile time check of, "does this model have
> TSX?". The "has_event" check is a runtime thing where we want to see
> if the event exists in sysfs in case the TSX was disabled say in the
> BIOS.
> 

Yes, that's sufficient.
But the "has_event" check seems very random.

For example,
>>>> +      Metric('tsx_cycles_per_transaction',
>>>> +             'Number of cycles within a transaction divided by the number of transactions.',
>>>> +             Select(cycles_in_tx / transaction_start,
>>>> +                    has_event(cycles_in_tx),
>>>> +                    0),
>>>> +             "cycles / transaction"),

I think both cycles_in_tx and transaction_start should be checked.

>>>> +      Metric('tsx_cycles_per_elision',
>>>> +             'Number of cycles within a transaction divided by the number of elisions.',
>>>> +             Select(cycles_in_tx / elision_start,
>>>> +                    has_event(elision_start),
>>>> +                    0),

This one only checks the elision_start event.

Thanks,
Kan
> Thanks,
> Ian
> 
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Kan
>>> +  except:> +    return None
>>> +
>>> +  elision_start = None
>>> +  try:
>>> +    # Elision start isn't supported by all models, but we'll not
>>> +    # generate the tsx_cycles_per_elision metric in that
>>> +    # case. Again, prefer the sysfs encoding of the event.
>>> +    elision_start = Event("HLE_RETIRED.START")
>>> +    elision_start = Event(f'{pmu}/el\-start/')
>>> +  except:
>>> +    pass
>>> +
>>> +  return MetricGroup('transaction', [
>>> +      Metric('tsx_transactional_cycles',
>>> +             'Percentage of cycles within a transaction region.',
>>> +             Select(cycles_in_tx / cycles, has_event(cycles_in_tx), 0),
>>> +             '100%'),
>>> +      Metric('tsx_aborted_cycles', 'Percentage of cycles in aborted transactions.',
>>> +             Select(max(cycles_in_tx - cycles_in_tx_cp, 0) / cycles,
>>> +                    has_event(cycles_in_tx),
>>> +                    0),
>>> +             '100%'),
>>> +      Metric('tsx_cycles_per_transaction',
>>> +             'Number of cycles within a transaction divided by the number of transactions.',
>>> +             Select(cycles_in_tx / transaction_start,
>>> +                    has_event(cycles_in_tx),
>>> +                    0),
>>> +             "cycles / transaction"),
>>> +      Metric('tsx_cycles_per_elision',
>>> +             'Number of cycles within a transaction divided by the number of elisions.',
>>> +             Select(cycles_in_tx / elision_start,
>>> +                    has_event(elision_start),
>>> +                    0),
>>> +             "cycles / elision") if elision_start else None,
>>> +  ], description="Breakdown of transactional memory statistics")
>>> +
>>> +
>>>  def main() -> None:
>>>    global _args
>>>
>>> @@ -100,6 +149,7 @@ def main() -> None:
>>>        Idle(),
>>>        Rapl(),
>>>        Smi(),
>>> +      Tsx(),
>>>    ])
>>>
>>>
>>
> 


Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ