[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <610d6b2d-a041-48cb-90f1-d53114e475f7@ti.com>
Date: Wed, 6 Nov 2024 13:28:00 -0600
From: Andrew Davis <afd@...com>
To: Conor Dooley <conor@...nel.org>, Matt Coster <Matt.Coster@...tec.com>
CC: Frank Binns <Frank.Binns@...tec.com>, David Airlie <airlied@...il.com>,
Simona Vetter <simona@...ll.ch>,
Maarten Lankhorst
<maarten.lankhorst@...ux.intel.com>,
Maxime Ripard <mripard@...nel.org>,
Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann@...e.de>, Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>,
Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>, Nishanth Menon <nm@...com>,
Vignesh Raghavendra <vigneshr@...com>,
Tero
Kristo <kristo@...nel.org>,
"dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org"
<dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org>,
"devicetree@...r.kernel.org"
<devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org"
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
Randolph Sapp <rs@...com>, Darren
Etheridge <detheridge@...com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 04/21] dt-bindings: gpu: img: Allow dma-coherent
On 11/6/24 12:30 PM, Conor Dooley wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 06, 2024 at 10:18:06AM +0000, Matt Coster wrote:
>> On 05/11/2024 18:06, Conor Dooley wrote:
>>> On Tue, Nov 05, 2024 at 03:58:10PM +0000, Matt Coster wrote:
>>>> This attribute will be required for the BXS-4-64 MC1 and will be enabled in
>>>> the DTS for the TI k3-j721s2 in a subsequent patch; add it now so
>>>> dtbs_check doesn't complain later.
>>>
>>> Sounds like the property should be made required for that integration.
>>
>> This is something I went back and forth on. Where is the line drawn
>> between things that should be enforced in bindings and things that only
>> ever need to be specified once, so should just be left to the dt itself
>> to be the source of truth?
>>
>> Having said that, I realise TI could spin a new SoC with a new dt but
>> use the same compatible string for the GPU;
>
> No they can't. New SoC, new compatible.
>
We don't need to make a new SoC for that, our bus infra allows us to
selectively include or exclude peripherals from coherency. The GPU
being `dma-coherent` is selectable at boot time.
Andrew
>> the "single" source of truth
>> then wouldn't be so single anymore. I guess by making this property
>> required for this compatible string, we're saying any use of it must
>> behave in exactly the same way, right?
Powered by blists - more mailing lists