linux-kernel - Re: ubifs_recover_master_node: failed to recover master node

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <2aadcbb0-298c-4b60-9d6f-a1b55f23de2b@alliedtelesis.co.nz>
Date: Wed, 6 Nov 2024 19:38:45 +0000
From: Chris Packham <Chris.Packham@...iedtelesis.co.nz>
To: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@...tlin.com>
CC: "linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org" <linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org>,
	"linux-spi@...r.kernel.org" <linux-spi@...r.kernel.org>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: ubifs_recover_master_node: failed to recover master node

Hi Miquel,

On 7/11/24 04:35, Miquel Raynal wrote:
> Hi Chris,
>
> On 29/10/2024 at 13:37:31 +13, Chris Packham <chris.packham@...iedtelesis.co.nz> wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I recently added support for the SPI-NAND controller on the RTL9302C SoC[1]. I did most of the work against Linux 6.11
>> and it's working fine there. I recently rebased against the tip of Linus's tree (6.12-rc5) and found I was getting ubifs
>> errors when mounting:
>>
>> [    1.255191] spi-nand spi1.0: Macronix SPI NAND was found.
>> [    1.261283] spi-nand spi1.0: 256 MiB, block size: 128 KiB, page size: 2048, OOB size: 64
>> [    1.271134] 2 fixed-partitions partitions found on MTD device spi1.0
>> [    1.278247] Creating 2 MTD partitions on "spi1.0":
>> [    1.283631] 0x000000000000-0x00000f000000 : "user"
>> [   20.481108] 0x00000f000000-0x000010000000 : "Reserved"
>> [   72.240347] ubi0: scanning is finished
>> [   72.270577] ubi0: attached mtd3 (name "user", size 240 MiB)
>> [   72.276815] ubi0: PEB size: 131072 bytes (128 KiB), LEB size: 126976 bytes
>> [   72.284537] ubi0: min./max. I/O unit sizes: 2048/2048, sub-page size 2048
>> [   72.292132] ubi0: VID header offset: 2048 (aligned 2048), data offset: 4096
>> [   72.299885] ubi0: good PEBs: 1920, bad PEBs: 0, corrupted PEBs: 0
>> [   72.306689] ubi0: user volume: 1, internal volumes: 1, max. volumes count: 128
>> [   72.314747] ubi0: max/mean erase counter: 1/0, WL threshold: 4096, image sequence number: 252642230
>> [   72.324850] ubi0: available PEBs: 0, total reserved PEBs: 1920, PEBs reserved for bad PEB handling: 40
>> [   72.370123] ubi0: background thread "ubi_bgt0d" started, PID 141
>> [   72.470740] UBIFS (ubi0:0): Mounting in unauthenticated mode
>> [   72.490246] UBIFS (ubi0:0): background thread "ubifs_bgt0_0" started, PID 144
>> [   72.528272] UBIFS error (ubi0:0 pid 143): ubifs_recover_master_node: failed to recover master node
>> [   72.550122] UBIFS (ubi0:0): background thread "ubifs_bgt0_0" stops
>> [   72.710720] UBIFS (ubi0:0): Mounting in unauthenticated mode
>> [   72.717447] UBIFS (ubi0:0): background thread "ubifs_bgt0_0" started, PID 149
>> [   72.777602] UBIFS error (ubi0:0 pid 148): ubifs_recover_master_node: failed to recover master node
>> [   72.787792] UBIFS (ubi0:0): background thread "ubifs_bgt0_0" stops
>>
>> Full dmesg output is at[2]
>>
>> git bisect lead me to commit 11813857864f ("mtd: spi-nand: macronix: Continuous read support"). Reverting the blamed
>> commit from 6.12-rc5 seems to avoid the problem. The flash chip on my board is a MX30LF2G28AD-TI. I'm not sure if there
>> is a problem with 11813857864f or with my spi-mem driver that is
>> exposed after support for continuous read is enabled.
> Crap. I had a look, and TBH I don't know. The only thing I see in your
> driver might be the DMA vs PIO choice. Could you try to always return
> false from rtl_snand_dma_op()?

It turned out the limitation was in my DMA support. With the fix for 
that[1] your changes are fine. I'm a little surprised I never hit 
problems with DMA prior to the continuous read changes but I guess the 
page reads would have been under the limit and my testing probably 
didn't trigger a big enough write.

> However you say you're using an MX30* device, this is a raw NAND chip,
> SPI-NAND chips are I believe starting with MX35* in their IDs, no?
I think I copied that part number off the wrong datasheet in my unsorted 
Downloads directory. The schematic for the board I have says 
MX35LF2GE4AD-Z4 and the correct datasheet has all the right things about 
SPI-NAND and continuous read.
>
> Thanks,
> Miquèl


[1] - 
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/broonie/spi.git/commit/?id=25d284715845a465a1a3693a09cf8b6ab8bd9caf