linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v6 4/5] x86: perf: Refactor misc flag assignments

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <ZyvLOjy8Vfvai5cG@linux.dev>
Date: Wed, 6 Nov 2024 12:02:02 -0800
From: Oliver Upton <oliver.upton@...ux.dev>
To: "Liang, Kan" <kan.liang@...ux.intel.com>
Cc: Colton Lewis <coltonlewis@...gle.com>, kvm@...r.kernel.org,
	Sean Christopherson <seanjc@...gle.com>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
	Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>,
	Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>,
	Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
	Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com>,
	Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...nel.org>, Ian Rogers <irogers@...gle.com>,
	Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@...el.com>,
	Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>, Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
	Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
	Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>,
	Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@...il.com>,
	Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@...roup.eu>,
	Naveen N Rao <naveen@...nel.org>,
	Heiko Carstens <hca@...ux.ibm.com>,
	Vasily Gorbik <gor@...ux.ibm.com>,
	Alexander Gordeev <agordeev@...ux.ibm.com>,
	Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@...ux.ibm.com>,
	Sven Schnelle <svens@...ux.ibm.com>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
	Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
	Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>, x86@...nel.org,
	"H . Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, linux-perf-users@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
	linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org, linux-s390@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 4/5] x86: perf: Refactor misc flag assignments

On Wed, Nov 06, 2024 at 11:03:10AM -0500, Liang, Kan wrote:
> > +static unsigned long common_misc_flags(struct pt_regs *regs)
> > +{
> > +	if (regs->flags & PERF_EFLAGS_EXACT)
> > +		return PERF_RECORD_MISC_EXACT_IP;
> > +
> > +	return 0;
> > +}
> > +
> > +unsigned long perf_arch_guest_misc_flags(struct pt_regs *regs)
> > +{
> > +	unsigned long guest_state = perf_guest_state();
> > +	unsigned long flags = common_misc_flags(regs);
> > +
> > +	if (guest_state & PERF_GUEST_USER)
> > +		flags |= PERF_RECORD_MISC_GUEST_USER;
> > +	else if (guest_state & PERF_GUEST_ACTIVE)
> > +		flags |= PERF_RECORD_MISC_GUEST_KERNEL;
> > +
> 
> The logic of setting the GUEST_KERNEL flag is implicitly changed here.
> 
> For the current code, the GUEST_KERNEL flag is set for !PERF_GUEST_USER,
> which include both guest_in_kernel and guest_in_NMI.

Where is the "guest_in_NMI" state coming from? KVM only reports user v.
kernel mode.

-- 
Thanks
Oliver