[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20241106201758.428310-1-ankur.a.arora@oracle.com>
Date: Wed, 6 Nov 2024 12:17:52 -0800
From: Ankur Arora <ankur.a.arora@...cle.com>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: peterz@...radead.org, tglx@...utronix.de, paulmck@...nel.org,
mingo@...nel.org, bigeasy@...utronix.de, juri.lelli@...hat.com,
vincent.guittot@...aro.org, dietmar.eggemann@....com,
rostedt@...dmis.org, bsegall@...gle.com, mgorman@...e.de,
vschneid@...hat.com, frederic@...nel.org, ankur.a.arora@...cle.com,
efault@....de, sshegde@...ux.ibm.com, boris.ostrovsky@...cle.com
Subject: [PATCH v2 0/6] RCU changes for PREEMPT_LAZY
This series adds RCU and some leftover scheduler bits for lazy
preemption.
The main problem addressed in the RCU related patches is that before
PREEMPT_LAZY, PREEMPTION=y implied PREEMPT_RCU=y. With PREEMPT_LAZY,
that's no longer true.
That's because PREEMPT_RCU makes some trade-offs to optimize for
latency as opposed to throughput, and configurations with limited
preemption might prefer the stronger forward-progress guarantees of
PREEMPT_RCU=n.
Accordingly, with standalone PREEMPT_LAZY (much like PREEMPT_NONE,
PREEMPT_VOLUNTARY) we want to use PREEMPT_RCU=n. And, when used in
conjunction with PREEMPT_DYNAMIC, we continue to use PREEMPT_RCU=y.
Patches 1 and 2 are cleanup patches:
"rcu: fix header guard for rcu_all_qs()"
"rcu: rename PREEMPT_AUTO to PREEMPT_LAZY"
Patch 3, "rcu: limit PREEMPT_RCU configurations", explicitly limits
PREEMPT_RCU=y to the PREEMPT_DYNAMIC or the latency oriented models.
Patches 4 and 5,
"rcu: handle quiescent states for PREEMPT_RCU=n, PREEMPT_COUNT=y"
"osnoise: handle quiescent states for PREEMPT_RCU=n, PREEMPTION=y"
handle quiescent states for the (PREEMPT_LAZY=y, PREEMPT_RCU=n)
configuration.
And, finally patch-6
"sched: warn for high latency with TIF_NEED_RESCHED_LAZY"
adds high latency warning for TIF_NEED_RESCHED_LAZY.
Goes on top of PeterZ's tree:
git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/peterz/queue.git sched/core
Changelog:
- fixup incorrect usage of tif_need_resched_lazy() (comment from
from Sebastian Andrzej Siewior)
- massaged the commit messages a bit
- drops the powerpc support for PREEMPT_LAZY as that was orthogonal
to this series (Shrikanth will send that out separately.)
Please review.
Ankur Arora (6):
rcu: fix header guard for rcu_all_qs()
rcu: rename PREEMPT_AUTO to PREEMPT_LAZY
rcu: limit PREEMPT_RCU configurations
rcu: handle quiescent states for PREEMPT_RCU=n, PREEMPT_COUNT=y
osnoise: handle quiescent states for PREEMPT_RCU=n, PREEMPTION=y
sched: warn for high latency with TIF_NEED_RESCHED_LAZY
include/linux/rcutree.h | 2 +-
include/linux/srcutiny.h | 2 +-
kernel/rcu/Kconfig | 4 ++--
kernel/rcu/srcutiny.c | 14 +++++++-------
kernel/rcu/tree_plugin.h | 11 +++++++----
kernel/sched/core.c | 3 ++-
kernel/sched/debug.c | 7 +++++--
kernel/trace/trace_osnoise.c | 22 ++++++++++++----------
8 files changed, 37 insertions(+), 28 deletions(-)
--
2.43.5
Powered by blists - more mailing lists